Friday, December 21, 2007

The Light of Faithfulness

All things came into being through him, and without him not one thing came into being. What has come into being in him was life, and the life was the light of all people. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it. The true light, which enlightens everyone, was coming into the world.” John 1:3-5, 9

Each morning we are awakened to light. Light is life as it causes vegetation to grow, and is integral to the cycle of precipitation. Without light we would live in a barren land. On a psychological level, a lack of light can cause depression and a generally pessimistic outlook. Light is life. Perhaps that is why I am constantly drawn to the imagery of light in the Bible. Light is used for providence, for safety, for purity, and of course for salvation. And as we approach Christmas day, our minds can’t help but be reminded of the dawning of a new day – the breaking in of new life. As the song of Zechariah puts it in Luke 1:78-79:

By the tender mercy of our God,
the dawn from on high will break upon us,
to give light to those who sit in darkness
and in the shadow of death,
to guide our feet into the way of peace.

And yet, as prevalent as I think the imagery of light is in the Bible, few worship songs convey this idea. However, there is one of particular significance. Phos Hilaron is an ancient Christian hymn originally written in Koine Greek. The hymn is known in English as 'Hail Gladdening Light' or 'O Resplendent Light'. It is the earliest known Christian hymn recorded outside of the Bible that is still being used today. It is found in a collection of songs to be sung in the morning, in the evening, before meals, and at candle lighting. The following version (translation) is from the 1979 American Book of Common Prayer:

O gracious Light,
pure brightness of the everliving Father in heaven,
O Jesus Christ, holy and blessed!
Now as we come to the setting of the sun,
and our eyes behold the vesper light,
we sing your praises, O God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
You are worthy at all times to be praised by happy voices,
O Son of God, O Giver of life,
and to be glorified through all the worlds.

May the image of light warm your soul this Christmas season and throughout the year, as we trust in the faithfulness of God just as we trust in the rising of the Sun.

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Do you see what I see?

I think this painting of the Nativity is very unique in that the baby looks like a baby. What else do you see?


"The Nativity" by Federico Barocci (c. 1535-1612)

The Literal Linus

(I brought out an old post, because for the second straight week, I just cannot write.)

Last year I watched the Peanuts Christmas special for the first time since being a kid. I had little interest, but my daughter was finally old enough to care, so we watched it together. The show is about Charlie Brown's struggle to get the "true meaning of Christmas." All his friends argue for the hoopla, and it really gets him stressed and depressed. When Charlie's frustration reaches its peak, Linus stands up to tell everyone the "true meaning of Christmas". He quotes from Luke 2.

I jumped out of my chair and pumped my fists in the air. "YES!" I loved it. Thank you Charles Schultz, and thank God for you.

Awesome, but I'd like to take you a slightly different direction. Let's go with the technically true meaning of "Christmas":

The results of Messiah.

Christos is Greek for Messiah, the one God promised to send to save Israel and the world. Mas is a suffix that we see in other words like charisma, diploma, enigma, and Alabama (okay, not that last one). The suffix means "the results of" or "in relation to".

So, everything that results form Jesus is, technically speaking, the true meaning of Christmas.

I no longer stand condemned. Merry Christmas! I am connected to the loving family of God. Merry Christmas! I am a part of ushering in the Kingdom of God to redeem the world. Merry Christmas!

As I think this through, one of the "Christmas-es" (the results of his coming) is this ornate over-the-top festival at the end of December. If the church did not pump this hol(y)day up as the birth of Jesus, it would have never become this big.

Along with a lot of silliness associated with Christmas is the beauty of gift-giving and family fellowship and giving to charity. All over the world people feel the merry results of his coming.

Okay, since this is really about the results of Jesus, what ought to be the defining features of how we celebrate Christmas? What thoughts, what actions should flow from us as a the result
of our Messiah?

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Non-Violence and the Christian - The Debate Revisited

Last week, I was in a conversation with a friend over non-violence and the Christian. He took the stance it is morally right and obliged to defend his family when threatened with violence. It churned my thoughts for days while I should have been focused on other things. Here are my thoughts a week later.

**

The question of whether non-violence is the Christian approach should not be decided within the context of a question in which we ask is it better to let people die or shoot someone with a gun. We should never be debating on what the lesser evil is. As a Christian, we take the hard and irrational stance of doing nothing if all we have are evil options.

So the debate comes full circle to whether it is right to harm anyone, ever. We avoid the fictitious and newsworthy situations because situations do not define the truth when there is a clear teaching of Scripture. The debate is always framed with the argument that killing someone is better than allowing a member of my family or another innocent to be killed. I do not see inflicting harm on another person clearly taught as a Christian practice in the New Testament. I have yet to hear a good argument on how killing someone is loving to the individual being killed. I see the teaching of loving our neighbor, enemey, and those who persecute us spread throughout the New Testament in a clear and unquestionable manner. We are to turn the other cheek, which taking down a shooter is not even doing on a personal level. If the New Testament does not clearly teach that we are to be violent when our back is against the wall, then I will choose nothing when left with only two evil options even if one is a lesser evil.

However, after saying that, I do believe that most situations can be solved by physical restraint without inflicting harm on the violent offender. There are those cases that can't. Those situations would be the ones where my faith would cause me to be persecuted. We need to be willing to die, not willing to kill. Although we do not strive to be persecuted and pray that we would live in peace, we should not be ashamed if our faith causes us to die. The world might think it is crazy, but it is a tradition of our faith that weaves throughout the history all the way back to the founding Apostles and culminates in our savior Himself. It seems to be a clear teaching of Scripture. Although difficult and irrational, this is the way I will live until convinced through Scripture otherwise. I am willing to submit to clear teachings of Scripture.

Sunday, December 16, 2007

Thursday, December 13, 2007

Godly Gift Giving

The season of gift giving and receiving is upon us. Much of the season has been commercialized as we all know and have heard. I will admit that I am a bit of a curmudgeon during this season – a Scrooge if you will. But if I let myself, sometimes I am reminded that the season celebrates something greater than giving and receiving gifts. It celebrates the ultimate gift given – the Christ Child.

It is pretty amazing when you stop and think about it, perhaps anew.
God coming down to earth in the form of a baby.
Living life in this world.
Suffering at our hands.
Dying.
Being raised from the dead.
God has given us the gift of a new life. He has given us the gift of blazing the trail. Of leading the way. Of giving us an example to follow. It is a pretty amazing gift – the gift that keeps on giving.

No doubt we say “Thanks” in various ways. We enjoy the gift. Maybe we use it as God intended. Maybe not. And often we don’t do anything in return. Of course, God didn’t give us this gift so he could get a gift in return, but courtesy dictates that when someone does something special for you, perhaps you can find a way to return the favor.

The Israelites understood this, and in their Law Code made it clear that a response from a grateful people was expected and in fact required:

Three times a year all your men must appear before the LORD your God at the place he will choose: at the Feast of Unleavened Bread, the Feast of Weeks and the Feast of Tabernacles. No man should appear before the LORD empty-handed: Each of you must bring a gift in proportion to the way the LORD your God has blessed you.” Deuteronomy 16:16-17

At three major festivals a year the Israelites proportionally returned to God the blessings He had bestowed. In an agrarian society, obviously a bumper crop of grapes meant that God got would receive a cornucopia of clusters. So what do we do? First, think of all the ways God has blessed you. Take your time and really consider all the ways you are blessed especially in ways you don’t think of. Think not just of what you have received but also what you haven’t. Consider all the things from which you have been spared that God didn’t have to. With these things in mind, ask yourself, “What would be a proportionate gift to give back to God?”

Is there anything that would suffice? What if we sold all the monetary blessings and gave the money to God? Would that be enough? What if we wanted to get God a Christmas gift? What do you get God? What do you get for the guy who has everything?
I made up a list of things I have purchased for my earthly father from time to time. Let’s see how that works out for God.

A car wash kit – From the Bible I read God doesn’t drive in a car – he drives in some weird cherubim driven throne (Ezekiel 1).
Cologne – Even God likes to smell nice right? Technically speaking, the knowledge of Christ enacted through us is supposed to be God’s fragrance (2 Corinthians 2:14-16)
A new grill – When God wants to cook his meat he sends fire down from heaven (1 Kings 18:38).
New shirt and tie – I think that God being clothed with splendor and majesty is always going to be better looking than some gaudy outfit (Psalm 104:1).

So we are left with some frustration on what to get the Creator of the universe. Perhaps the best gift we can give to God is to use His gift to us wisely. Not to take for granted the new, full life that we now experience. As Peter puts it, “Each one should use whatever gift he has received to serve others, faithfully administering God’s grace in its various forms” (1 Peter 4:10).

The one thing that God doesn’t possess is our choices to love and serve others. He doesn’t control our actions. They are the only things that we have that we can give God. It is also the only thing that he desires. Sure, he appreciates Bible reading, prayer times, church attendance, or tithing. Those are all good things. But what makes his face light up like a child opening that special gift on Christmas morning is seeing us treat one another with grace, dignity, respect – love.

“This service that you perform is not only supplying the needs of God’s people but is also overflowing in many expressions of thanks to God. Because of the service by which you have proved yourselves, men will praise God for the obedience that accompanies your confession of the gospel of Christ, and for your generosity in sharing with them and with everyone else. And in their prayers for you their hearts will go out to you, because of the surpassing grace God has given you. Thanks be to God for his indescribable gift!
2 Corinthians 9:12-15

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Im Memory

Yesterday, Central Holston Christian Church lost a saint. John Bullock ended his struggle with poor health and now stands before God with a resurrected body. He will forever be remembered by this church as source of grace, encouragement, and a vision for the future. He stands as a testament to the love of Christ. May God eagerly receive his child, for few that I know have kept the family name freer from stain.

Sunday, December 9, 2007

A Few Random Relgious Thoughts

Golden Compass Flops

It seems like this movie was trying to cash in on the Narnia success. The difference here is that the church was not the villain in Narnia. Even I, being one of the more anti-establishment people I know, do not want to sit my children in a movie theatre with a movie who portrays the church as bad guys. Give me The Hunchback of Notre Dame or something like that.

Man quits having sex with a minor to go to church

First, Ryan White (that's his real name), an employee of mine, showed me this story. He knew about it because it is a friend of his father's child. This goes along with my comments last week about mental Christians. A 23-year-old leaves a 14-year-old handcuffed to his bed after having sex with her in order to go to church and continue once he gets back. Wow! That's an insane story.

Friday, December 7, 2007

The Ineffability of God

From Saint Augustine – Confessions: Book 1 (Chapter 4)

What, therefore, is my God?
Most high, most excellent, most potent, most omnipotent;
most merciful and most just;
most secret and most truly present;
most beautiful and most strong;
stable, yet not supported;
unchangeable, yet changing all things;
never new, never old;
making all things new,
yet bringing old age upon the proud, and they know it not;
always working, ever at rest;
gathering, yet needing nothing;
sustaining, pervading, and protecting;
creating, nourishing, and developing;
seeking, and yet possessing all things.
He does love, but without passion;
He is jealous, yet free from care;
He is angry, yet remains serene.
He recovers what he has never really lost.
He owes humans nothing,
yet pays out to them as if in debt to His creation.
Yet, O my God, my life, my holy Joy,
what is this that I have said?
What can any man say when he speaks of You?
But woe to them that keep silence—
since even those who say most are dumb.


Some things just cannot be described with words. Such is the case with God. There is an ineffable (indescribable) quality to God. As one professor continually reminded us, “All language about God is metaphorical.” We cannot properly describe God. Our brains are not big enough. Words cannot properly capture God. Words fail, falter, and crack under the pressure of trying to describe God. And strangely enough, though we cannot capture God with our language, he still desires for us to attempt it.

Most of us have an image of God that is valid, but it is not full. It is very simplistic like “God is great. God is good. Thank you God for this food.” The problem is that we don’t do any further searching and investigating. We stay with this view without delving into the mysterious reality that God is bigger than we have ever imagined. God cannot be possessed. God is unknown. God is a mystery. And yet, God but wants to be made known.

“It is the glory of God to conceal things but the glory of kings to search them out.” Proverbs 25:2

To really come into contact with God, we have search him out. At some point we will have to wrestle with Him. Not physically like Jacob, but mentally and spiritually. Part of wrestling with God is the possibility of breaking something. As you really consider the mystery God it might shatter your simplistic, preconceived notions and understandings about who God is. God cannot be possessed, but he can be struggled with. And in the struggle, we go deep into the mystery of God’s character and what he is doing in this world. Because though we can never fully grasp God, he gives us clues and hints along the way. Meister Eckhart put it this way: “God is like a person who clears his throat while hiding and so gives himself away.”

Isaiah 55:6-9 encourages us to,
“Seek the LORD while he may be found,
call upon him while he is near;
For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
nor are your ways my ways, says the LORD.
For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
so are my ways higher than your ways
and my thoughts than your thoughts.”


God is Mysterious but not unsearchable. We should be completely blown away by who God is. This is the God of the universe we are talking about. Who can create with a word. Destroy with a word. But we should not for that reason stop the search. Part of growing in faith involves the exercise of wrestling with the mysteries of God – not necessarily solve them but to come to a better understanding of them. And by doing so reflect God’s mysteries to this world. You cannot proclaim or make known the mystery unless you yourself have discovered it. It is obviously not obvious. At the same time, it is not meant to remain hidden.

"The knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them.” Matthew 13:11

The mystery of God and His kingdom has been disclosed and made available to those who seek. Let us begin to unravel the mystery of God.

Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Zimmerman on Willow Creek (a guest post)

As soon as I read this article on Out of Ur, I was eager to hear what Barry Zimmerman would say about it. Barry always has a provacative take, and I recall him saying the same things that it took Willow Creek years of research to discover. Barry graciously agreed to post his thoughts on that article here.

Willow Creek has released the results of a multi-year study on the effectiveness of their programs and philosophy of ministry and their Pastor Bill Hybels himself has called the results "ground breaking," "earth shaking" and "mind blowing."

Here are some more of Hybles comments:

"Some of the stuff that we have put millions of dollars into thinking it would really help our people grow and develop spiritually, when the data actually came back it wasn't helping people that much. Other things that we didn't put that much money into and didn't put much staff against is stuff our people are crying out for. We made a mistake. What we should have done when people crossed the line of faith and become Christians, we should have started telling people and teaching people that they have to take responsibility to become 'self feeders.' We should have gotten people, taught people, how to read their Bible between services, how to do the spiritual practices much more aggressively on their own."


I want to start by saying I truly believe Hybels and the whole "seeker-sensitive" movement had great intentions. Unfortunately, good intentions without good theology and biblical practices can produce, as evidenced here, unintentional results.

The key to the "seeker-sensitive" failures is found in Hybels statement "…we should have started telling people and teaching people that they have to take responsibility to become 'self feeders.' So my follow up question is, "Why didn't you?" I think it's because they found it took much less effort to build a church than to disciple Christians and fell into the trap of following the route of least resistance.

I remember speaking with a full-time worship minister at a congregation of about 250 about how he fills his time seeing as my responsibilities in a congregation of 350 include worship and it only takes up about 40% of my week’s efforts. After hearing about the amount of time he spent preparing videos, special effects, slideshows, musical numbers, "creative" experiences, etc. I asked how his congregation's efforts at education and small groups were going. The answer? "We'll we had to cancel Sunday School to do our second service and we're hoping to get small groups going."

A question I have often asked people in large, quickly growing churches, that have added more services at the expense of education and small groups is, "If I could guarantee you deeper spiritual growth and a great small group ministry would you be willing to cancel one or more of your services and or risk slowing your growth?" I've yet to find someone in this situation who will simply answer, "Yes." Most simply state they want to do both yet have been unable to give an objective concrete example of a church that has accomplished that. Ironically, they've often tried to use Willow Creek as their example.

I believe what happened was that as seeker-sensitive methods were put into place, crowds were drawn in numbers not seen in years. And the inevitable question was asked, "How do we keep this going?" It's exciting to see more and more new faces, seeing a building fill to capacity, adding services, adding new programs, and having a community talk about your church. The staff that is seen as being a part of the process is seen as successful in the eyes of their peers. I know as our congregation has experienced some of the most explosive growth in its history the first question that tends to get asked is, "How do we keep this going?" It's the wrong question. It's also a possibly spiritually crippling question.

How do you keep it going? Well as far as I've seen churches try, you eliminate programs that aren't drawing big numbers for programs that do. You eliminate Sunday School and you add Worship Services. You get rid of small home groups and you add "felt need" seminars. You wait on hiring that Christian Ed staff member and you add a Worship minister and build a bigger sanctuary. You spend 95% of your time planning services and try to get small groups going with the remaining 5%. You go for the things that "keep it going" bigger and faster. The result? You keep numerical growth going at the expense of the spiritual growth of a large number of individuals.

I believe the more vital question to ask as a congregation begins to grow numerically, no matter the methods, is, "How do we disciple all these new faces?" To answer that question we need to emphasize and put more resources into beefing up our educational and small group ministries. We need to take time to purposely get these people into community. We need staff that are willing to invest their time into individuals even at the perceived expense to the crowd. We need people as committed to developing solid theology as to attending this years Christmas show. We need to understand it's most likely lives will truly be changed by an extra 40 hours poured into small group planning than getting the right video and logos together for the next sermon series.

The problem is this most likely won't happen at the same rate as you can gather a crowd or draw as much attention and accolades. The answers to this question won't get your church as much attention. The answers to the question might necessitate taking same resources, both financial and staff/time, from your "big draw" programs and into things like teacher training, new member assimilation, and mentoring. It might mean that 3 rd Sunday Service that draws 300 people may need to be replaced by an education time that only draws 100 at first. It might mean that in order to disciple well your growth rate dips.

Jesus understood if the Church was going to make it into the future He needed to focus on discipling a small group even at the expense of a bigger crowd. It wasn't the crowd that was destined to carry the torch but a handful of committed and well taught disciples. It was this small group that was key to 3000 coming forward at the first Church service not the 5000 that had been fed on the hillside.

So when it is all said and done it is not the seeker-sensitive mindset that has failed. It is a definite proven tool to draw people in. It was the question that was asked afterward that led to failure. It's time to realize that disicpling these seekers is as important, if not more important, than simply adding them to our numbers. There is a need for a more holistic view of what successful growth looks like. As Willow Creek has shown, the world will not be changed by church goers, so it's time to get back to the slow hard work of going and discipling and teaching.

After all, that is what we've been commissioned to do.

Monday, December 3, 2007

Mental Gymnastics - I am an Olympic Gymnast

I am a gymnast. I like to think that I am one of the best. I know everything there is about gymnastics. I have studied it all. From knowing the proper placements of all the mats to the proper methods for the floor routine. I am a gymnast.

The other day I was doing what I love to do. I watching some gymnastics, eating some Lays, and a lot of Red Bull (used to be Pepsi). Eating Lays always reminds me of Nadia's great floor routine in '76. Lays has become an essential part of my gymnastics routine because they are linked with so many of my great gymnastic memories. My doctor told me to cut back or quit because of my diabetes, but I told her that it is an essential part of my gymnastics routine. How could I expect to be the best gymnast in the world if I gave up my Lays and Red Bull?

It has also been a little more difficult lately. After the removal of my toes and the pain of the cold in my house, it just has not been the same. I have trouble getting around like I used to, but then I just think of Mary Lou in '84 and I immediately have the spring back in my step. Well, at least for the arduous journey to the bathroom and back. That is about all of the walking I do any more. I am an excellent gymnast.

Winter is coming and I just have not been able to winterize my house. Some times my television gets frosted over because it is so cold. It brings back memories of figure skating in the Olympics (an inferior sport), but then I have to call my neighbor over to help wipe it off. When I see my neighbor wiping off the frost on my television I reminded of the great American team performance in '96.

I am a great gymnast.

Wednesday, November 28, 2007

Dear Santa

Dear Saint Nicholas,

First, I want praise your tireless efforts in this ministry. You have become a world-wide symbol of generosity. Children and adults worldwide are made glad by your giving.

You also deserve recognition for your cutting-edge “green” transportation methods. And with the voucher money you are receiving from Al Gore, you can keep the PETA people at bay.

I do have a couple of minor concerns, however.

My first is about what seems to be showboating. The public appearances are growing incessant and coming earlier and earlier every year. I mean, parades? Are they necessary? When do you get any work done? Or are the under-sized workers doing everything while you hoard the accolades?

Also, it seems odd for a saint, one set apart for God, to be sitting enthroned on stages while people wait in line for just a moments interaction. The photo fee does not sit well either.

However, my biggest complaint is a matter of justice. Why do you give so much more to the wealthy children than the poor? This makes no sense whatsoever, and it just seems cruel. Do you take pleasure in the widening disparity between the haves and the have-nots? Where is your heart?

Truly, for this you should feel great shame. Your disregard for the poor is despicable. I beg you to change your ways.

Your Brother in Christ,
Shannon Caroland

p.s. This time get me a docking system for my mp3 player that isn’t totally lame.

Monday, November 26, 2007

Loving Even When it is Tough

Here is a little parenting story that taught me about love. After writing it, it makes me feel like my house is out of control. But this does not happen too often - at least I hope.

We reward Eli with candy any time that he poops in the potty. If he poops right before his nap, we make him set the candy aside until he wakes up. That is what happened yesterday.

We also give Isaac a candy whenever Eli poops in the potty. This is to spur on some peer pressure to encourage Eli to poop in the potty. Yesterday, Isaac threw a fit after lunch over the fact that we were out of applesauce and he could not have any for dessert; therefore, we sent him to bed early. This caused him to not be awake when we had the poop candy celebration.

When Eli and Isaac were both back awake, Eli went to get his candy. Isaac started to complain that he did not have a candy. I told him that he was punished for throwing a fit and would not get a candy. He then became angry and started yelling, "Eli is mean! Mean! Mean!" If there was any anger, it should have been directed at me. Eli was innocent. All he did was poop in the toilet.

Eli responded by immediately going over to the candy, picking out a sucker (Isaac's favorite item) and bringing it to him. I was not about to take it away. I did not want Isaac to be rewarded for the bad behavior, but I did not want to rob Eli of participating in a loving act after being treated wrongly.

I hope I can be as loving to those who treat me wrongly.

Friday, November 23, 2007

Congratulations...

to the Clem family on the addition of a baby girl, on Thanksgiving Day and everything. My suggestions for a name is Shannon.

You can leave your suggestions and conratulations in the comments.

Monday, November 19, 2007

a vacation

I am on vacation this week and am taking a break from writing.

Have a good week.

Friday, November 16, 2007

Love is Suicide

I was listening to “Melancholy and the Infinite Sadness” album by Smashing Pumpkins the other day and there is a song called “Bodies”. It includes a very startling phrase – “Love is suicide.” The juxtaposition of these words makes little sense. Love – which carries the ideal of society – equated with suicide - considered a coward's way out and often the product of mental instability. But as I think about discipleship, these combined words can make sense.

Matthew 16:25 “For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will find it.” Or, as the German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote in The Cost of Discipleship, “When Jesus bids a man come, he bids him come and die.

Following Christ means dying to self. It means killing off many of the selfish expectations one might have for one’s life. If we desire to rise to the heights of politics, social standings, or career advancement, our hands are not fit for the plow. At the same time, to take seriously Christ’s call to follow Him leaves little room for the things the world holds dear. A life of discipleship will not endear or engender us to the world.

Lets face it, having standards is political suicide. Extending the hand of fellowship to the freaks and losers is social suicide and probably will cause us to end up in such a group. Considering others better than ourselves and putting them first is career suicide and will not advance us up the corporate ladder.

True discipleship that is based on love for God and others is suicide. And yet, that is the message of the gospel. But proclaiming this aspect of the gospel has become less and less popular as time goes on. Why? Because sacrifice and death are not marketable. How can we expect to make converts if the cost could mean our very lives? That concept is not easy to spin and market.

Yes, love and discipleship are costly. But as usual, our selfish mindset causes us to focus on what we are missing out on instead of what we gain. In addition, we see Christianity as just a blessing for the next life and miss out on the blessings of discipleship in this life. Richard Foster looks at this issue in the following way:

Nondiscipleship costs: abiding peace, a life penetrated throughout buy love, faith that sees everything in the light of God’s overriding governance for good, hopefulness that stands firm in the most discouraging of circumstances, power to do what is right and withstand the forces of evil. In short, it costs exactly that abundant life that Jesus said He came to bring.


Yes, love is suicide. But living a mediocre spiritual life causes us to miss out on some of the greatest blessings that God is dolling out. Giving one’s life up to gain a better one – seems crazy. But maybe there is something to this whole discipleship thing.

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

The job

I have a friend who is looking for a new job. He is a truck driver. If he was offered a job that would pay more, was easier, and would somehow bring more prestige, what would you suggest? You would probably at least suggest that he look into it more.

You probably would not chastise him for wanting to earn more doing an easier job. Even as shallow as prestige is, you would not begrudge a truck driver from seeking it. Would you?

These are some of the many differences between ministry as a career and other careers. Most are very critical of ministers who chase money, ease, and prestige.

Those things are me-centered. We want spiritual leaders devoid of pride. Going without is heroic. We want heroes.

There is a difference, a big one. Most people go to work, not because they really want to lend a hand to Corporation X, but because they need income. The earning goal, then is “as much as I can get”. And that’s fine, I’d say, as long as you are doing so honestly.

Pastors have the privilege of working toward what they love and believe in most. The pay goal, then becomes “as much as I need to be able to do this.” You do not want to be paid so much that it hinders the church’s mission, because you care more about the church’s mission than about making money.

In the secular fields a Christian often gets as much as you can in as little time as possible so that she can devote as much time and money toward the Kingdom as possible. Logically, that same Christian, if she were employed by a church, would give as much time for as little money as reality would allow. There are still bills to pay and families to shepherd.

Of course, what works best is when a church generously gives their workers as much as they can afford while the workers keep giving back as much as possible.

I’m guessing Regan will have something very interesting to say about this.

Monday, November 12, 2007

The Anabaptist tradition and the Amish-Mennonite Split

An Anabaptist is someone who is committed to "adult voluntary baptism, separation of church and state, non-violence in all of life which included not taking part in the military, and the Bible (N.T.) as final authority threatened the unity of church and state." That sounds a lot like the church of Christ/Christian church. A popular Anabaptist belief statement can be found here. The Anabaptist were persecuted and killed by both the Protestants and Catholics throughout Europe.

What is amazing to me in reading the story of the Anabaptist split in the 1600s that brought about the Amish is how similar the whole debate is to the one that goes on within church of Christ/Christian churches in regards to baptism and the salvation of those not baptized. Hans Reist led a group of believers in a heavily persecuted area. He considered his neighbors around him who were Protestant and members of the state church as saved despite not being baptized as adults. This salvation was shown through their kind and loving actions towards the Anabaptists during times of persecution. Jakob Ammann believed that all outsiders should be shunned, along with any church member that also strayed. It was these two individuals that led the Anabaptists down a course of division. In the end, their personalities prevented the two groups from being able to discuss the doctrines in a friendly and rational manner. The result was a splintering of the Anabaptists into two distinct groups: Mennonites and Amish.

Here is an excerpt from the A History of the Amish by Steven Nolt.

For Ammann, the danger the church faced was compromise. The Anabaptist reformers of 150 years earlier had given their lives for a church that would be a visible alternative to sinful society. Now some Mennonites were resorting to outward compromise, agreeing to attend state church catechism or even have their infants baptized to avoid exile. Relations with the True-Hearted were especially problematic, Ammann charged, because of the half-commitment of such folks only mirrored lack of full-fledged conviction on the part of many Anabaptists themselves. He also believed that Mennonites were willing to sacrifice humility and simplicity in their efforts to fit in with those around them. In contrast, Ammann required male members to wear untrimmed beards and forbade "haughty clothing." Fashionable styles represented frivolous spending, and the use of buttons to fasten coats suggested the ornamental style of military uniforms; neither stood the test of the biblical injunction to avoid even the appearance of evil.

Moreover, if the Anabaptists had really believed that salvation was given by grace through faith, then the True-Hearted (state-churched neighbors of the Anabaptist who helped them during times of persecution), who had not publicly accepted such grace and submitted to its accompanying symbol of water baptism, could not be saved. The same was true for what Ammann saw as the clear New Testament teaching of social avoidance: there was no middle ground. In those regions where persecution was relatively light and compromise was a greater threat--Alsace, parts of the Palatinate, and the mountains south and west of Bern--Ammann received most of his support. He championed strict doctrinal interpretations and an activist approach that appealed to Mennonites who desired a strong group identity in an atmosphere of relative tolerance.

For Reist and the old Mennonite communities in the Emme River Valley and parts of the Palatinate, the threat was anything but lost identity. Their identity as outcasts and the targets of state persecution was all too clear. For the Reist group, the threat to the church was a cold legalism. They already faced enough external threats. Shunning or stricter dress standards that would divide them from within were the last thing they needed. Nor were they keen to receive lectures on faithfulness from those who lived in relative safety outside of Bern.

Additionally Reist could claim--probably quite accurately--that the Swiss Anabaptists had never practiced social avoidance, even if they had agreed to it in principle during unity discussions with their northern European Mennonite cousins years before. Ammann's insistence on implementing it now only stirred up trouble. Physical avoidance was simply not taught in the New Testament, as Reist read it. And as for the True-Hearted, Reist thought that it was presumptuous for humans to declare whether or not a person was saved, baptism notwithstanding. Yet despite their emphasis on openness and opposition to avoidance, it was the Mennonites who seemed to practice shunning when opportunities for reconciliation arrived.


After reading through this story and looking at the present state of the church of Christ/Christian churches I am left with a few questions: Why does baptism always become an instrument of division? Why can we not view things from other people's perspectives? How do we decide what is and is not a biblical issue? How do we have unity?

Friday, November 9, 2007

Theodicy and the Kingdom

In the Old Testament Survey Class that I teach at King College, we discussed Job this past week. I have taught this lesson many times and my view of theodicy (the theology that reconciles a loving, good God with the human experience of evil in the world) is pretty well established. To summarize: bad things happen to good people because we live in a world of choices and consequence. Though I do not buy into retribution theology as dogmatically as Job’s friends did, I do see that God has ordained a system in which our free decisions and actions affect ourselves and others.

For example, why does a nice family of four die while the drunk driver who killed them lives on? Because it was in God’s will to take them? No, because the drunk driver chose to become inebriated and then attempt to drive. God’s hand was not in that decision and humanity suffers the consequence. Can God redeem that situation? Yes, but I do not believe he preordained it. Thus, we see that our actions affect this world (far beyond ourselves) for good or bad.

But this week I think my off-the-cuff remarks in class belied a refinement of my thought. God would have us make decisions and choices that do not result in the awful consequences we see all around us. As these proper choices are made based on love of God and neighbor, we would see a world that perhaps would not expose “good people” to “bad things.” This world would see less of the atrocities that are far too prevalent. And as I reflected on this concept I could not help but be drawn back to the Kingdom of God. Is this the basis of the Kingdom? That as we let the reign and rule of God pervade our lives God transforms the world and attempts restoration? I think so.

The Kingdom comes as humanity enfleshes the gospel and becomes united with one another and the King for the common purpose of reconciling creation. Perhaps then we would not have to explain why bad things happen to good people, because it would be evident that their decisions are not in line with the Kingdom.

May God’s Kingdom come. May His will be done.

Wednesday, November 7, 2007

Chase 23

It is a challenge to read a portion of the Bible that we have heard/read hundreds of times. But that is what I was attempting to do with the Twenty-third Psalm.

I have read this passage a billion times, give or take a hundred million, so this was difficult. I had always read this Psalm as a comfort, reminder that God is taking care of things. This is, of course true, and a big reason it is by far the most-read passage at funerals.

But as I read this passage over and over again, a new theme rose from the page. I began to see them as the words of a believer who had returned from rebellion. A song for the soundtrack of Luke 15, if you will.

YHWH is shepherd: the one who gathers me from wayward wanderings.

I don’t need (lack, want) a thing: perhaps a confession of someone who had gone searching from something more.

He renews my strength, leads me in righteous paths: the words of someone who had exhausted himself on the path of unrighteousness.

Even walking through the valley of Death’s Shadow, I’ll not fear for you are with me: There is no place that he won't go in order to find us and bring us home.

Your rod and staff comfort me: The jab of his rod and the yank of his hook are a comfort, because it is his discipline which keeps me from returning to such undesirable places.

You feed me right in my enemies' faces, anointing my head, overflowing my cup: Not a bad place for a guy who had recently strayed from God into Death Shadow.

Without doubt, goodness and mercy will never let off my trail: Good news for a proven wanderer. And this is the kind astounding realization someone might have if they have had their relationship with God restored.

I will live in the house of the Lord all the days of my life: Thanks to his sheepdog-like pursuit, I’m not ever leaving again.

Monday, November 5, 2007

The Amish

Over the next few weeks, I am going to share some of the information that I am learning in regards to the Amish. I hope you find it as interesting, challenging, and inspiring as I did.

This information is from the book Amish Roots edited by John Hostetler, a collection of various original writings from Amish or about Amish over a variety of topics. It was Hostetler's intention “to enable the reader to comprehend the lifeways of the Amish people. Reading the literary works of the Amish instead of the generalizations made by others about them has its rewards (xi).

"The Amish emerged 168 years after the founding of the Swiss Anabaptists, and in the social context of decadent Swiss congregations that were surviving in remote rural areas. Jacob Amman's confrontations with fellow elders called for greater separation from the world, more stringent dress and grooming practices, and the expulsion of apostate members. No record is left of any Amish leaders who had ever attended university or had ever been pastors in state churches. The leaders were farmers and craftsmen who lived in the hinterlands wit the Bible, the hymn book , and the martyr book as their main sources of inspiration" (xii)

On of the letters in the book stood out from the rest. "Ninety-five percent of the Amish who were drafted chose conscientious objector status and were assigned to Civilian Public Service camps to 'perform work of national importance'...A minority of the Amish refused to report for civilian work. To accept governmental orders to work in 'worldly' places away from their family and community was as threatening as military service." The following excerpts are from a letter written by one of those who went to jail for refusing to serve in civilian work during World War II.

"When I was a boy, one bit of advice was branded in my conscience. It was this: 'In case of doubt, it is best for a Christian to choose the course that goes hardest against his nature or desires.'"

"While I was in the gym one day watching others play a game, an inmate came over and slapped me across the face. It took me by surprise and I didn't know why it was done. At once the prisoner was ashamed of himself. We had always been friends. He told me that some of the men were betting that I would strike back, so they decided to test me. There were other times when they tried out my faith by betting with each other. It made me feel quite small."

"Soon after I was at the first honor camp, a homosexual approached me. I had already been given warnings. At times I hardly knew what to do but each time they would leave me alone. From then on I learned to listen them out, and I was more careful. There were some who said they would protect me if I got in trouble. They threatened to beat up anybody who would molest me.
One of my brothers also served his time in prison. He has had a lot of experiences that cannot be valued in money. The experiences are not pleasing to human nature at the time. But if the trials are met in a righteous way, it can be rewarding and help us toward our goal for a heavenly home in eternity."

"The responsibility is upon us to lay a solid foundation of faith for the future generation. To do that, we will have to lead a life in which God can help us."

Thursday, November 1, 2007

Racism Overreaction?

Something has been bugging me lately and I have to get it off my mind. It revolves around racism, sexism, and perhaps bigotry in general. It seems that everywhere I turn someone or someone’s action is being labeled a “racist”. Imus brought huge headlines a few months ago by calling the Rutgers’ women’s basketball team “a bunch of nappy headed hos.” The Revrends Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson lead a thousand person march against the little town of Jena, TX to rally against what they claim is racism in the treatment of 6 African American boys charged with assault against a Caucasian boy.

And then there is this article that again puts Rutgers in the racism spotlight as a professor is under fire for saying that it would be better to give a scholarship to a minority that is willing to use his or her mental faculties rather than a “functional illiterate.” His words were branded by the president as a “blatantly racist statement.” This professor is of course the same guy who was arrested in the South in the 1960s for work in the civil rights movements. He also retaliated by calling the president a racist for exploiting minorities through the athletic programs.

Now here is my problem – “racism” has emerged as the latest buzzword in media and political circles. Basically, if you do something of which someone else disapproves, especially if different races are involved, you will be labeled a racist, sexist, or bigot. I don’t deny that such things happen, even if unconsciously. But the labeling and over reactive responses have gone too far.

Let’s face some facts – men and women are different. White, black Asian, Indian, whatever – races and nationalities are different. We do not just look different – at times we do different things better and worse. Sure, some may be cultural, but they are still different. I don’t deny that many of these differences tend to be stereotypes, but as my brother used to say, “They are stereotypes for a reason.” And it is not racist or sexist to observe these differences.

The bigotry comes in when we use these differences as a basis for denigrating others and removing their God given value and worth to society. When it goes from observations to ridicule then we do live up to the labels. But for a person to “call a spade a spade” should not brand them something that they are not. If we are truly going to live in a united world – an “equal” world – then we need to embrace our differences and realize that equality does not lie in what we can or cannot do, but in who God made us to be. Our equality stems from our worth in God’s eyes – not each others’.

Am I wrong here? Am I too steeped in racism to see the issue clearly?

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Settling Jabez

Jabez was more honorable than his brothers. His mother had named him Jabez, saying, "I gave birth to him in pain." Jabez cried out to the God of Israel, "Oh, that you would bless me and enlarge my territory! Let your hand be with me, and keep me from harm so that I will be free from pain." And God granted his request.

1 Chronicles 4:9,10

First Chronicles begins with nine chapters of genealogy. It is a refresher course to people returning to Jerusalem after 70 years of Babylonian exile. It reminded them that they were all connected through Jacob and his sons. It is a much-needed encouragement to people trying to reclaim a promise made to their forefathers.

These genealogies are incomplete in places and seem to favor highlighting notable figures. Tucked within this family tree a few stories, mostly about battles. The stories seem to have the same purpose as the genealogy as a whole. They say, "This is who you are. This is how God deals with Israel."

In the last few years the most famous section, the only one paid any attention by most Christians, has been the two verses about Jabez and his prayer. This is thanks mostly to the mega-huge best-seller book by Bruce Wilkinson. Some claimed that it was a book pushing the "Health and Wealth" gospel. I never read it, so I cannot comment.

I am begrudgingly reading a Rick Warren book called "God's Answers to Life's Difficult Questions". I find the book annoying for several reasons, mostly because there is constant eisogesis going on. He tells us about the emotional well-being of Bible characters like he is their personal shrink.

He has a chapter about striving to be above average where Jabez gets set up as the example to follow. He is praised as a man who had 1. Great Ambition 2. Growing Faith and 3. Genuine Prayer.

I don't know if all that is true. What I do know is that he prayed for more land and less pain was granted that prayer. A man whose name meant pain was eventually kept form pain. And I know he was honorable.

He had the faith to ask God, and God gave. I might not go as far as Rick Warren who said "If you combine the three requests that Jabez prayed for, I guarantee that you will live above average." But I will say that is always encouraging to see someone blessed, because they prayed.

Maybe it's selfish. Maybe it is immature. But protection and wealth are still powerful motivators. I'd bet that those returning to Jerusalem would feel the same way.

But we must be careful not confuse faithfulness as some sort of guarantee for what most would call success. Hebrews 11 shows how diverse the results of our faith can be:

1. The Good results:
32 And what more shall I say? I do not have time to tell about Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, David, Samuel and the prophets, 33 who through faith conquered kingdoms, administered justice, and gained what was promised; who shut the mouths of lions, 34 quenched the fury of the flames, and escaped the edge of the sword; whose weakness was turned to strength; and who became powerful in battle and routed foreign armies. 35 Women received back their dead, raised to life again.

2. The Not-So-Good results:

Others were tortured and refused to be released, so that they might gain a better resurrection. 36 Some faced jeers and flogging, while still others were chained and put in prison. 37 They were stoned ; they were sawed in two; they were put to death by the sword. They went about in sheepskins and goatskins, destitute, persecuted and mistreated— 38 the world was not worthy of them. They wandered in deserts and mountains, and in caves and holes in the ground.

Because of Daniel's faith, he was saved from the lions. Because of the early Christians faith, they were killed by lions in the arena. Sometimes God saves people from pain due to their faith. Other times they are tortured and die for their faith.

Jabez prayed for wealth and protection and got it. Others have prayed with equal faith and been denied.

I guess the question is this: Do you have the faith to pray knowing that He might say yes or no, may rescue you or let you be share in suffering, may provide or let you scrape?

Monday, October 29, 2007

New Ideas are Overemphasized

I recently ran across the following quote in one of the books I am reading for school. It definitely made me reevaluate some of my thoughts, especially those concerning the concept of the kingdom of God, something I have been doing lately anyway. This comes from Clifford Geertz's The Intepretation of Cultures.

In her book, Philosophy in a New Key, Susanne Langer remarks that certain ideas burst upon the intellectual landscape with a tremendous force. They resolve so many fundamental problems at once that they seem also to promise that they will resolve all fundamental problems, clarify all obscure issues. Everyone snaps them up as the open sesame of some new positive science, the conceptual center-point around with a comprehensive system of analysis can be built. The sudden vogue of such a grande idee, crowding out almost everything else for a while, is due, she says, "to the fact that all sensitive and active minds turn at once to exploiting it. We try it in every connection, for every purpose, experiment with possible stretches of its strict meaning, with generalizations and derivatives."

After we have become familiar with the new idea, however, after it has become part of our general stock of theoretical concepts, our expectations are brought more into balance with its actual uses, and its excessive popularity is ended. A few zealots persist in the old key-to-the-universe view of it; but less driven thinkers settle down after a while to the problems the idea has really generated. They try to apply it and extend it where it applies and where it is capable of extension; and they desist where it does not apply or cannot be extended. It becomes, if it was, in truth, a seminal idea in the first place, a permanent and enduring part of our intellectual armory. But it no longer has the grandiose, all-promising scope, the infinite versatility of apparent application, it once had. The second law of thermodynamics, or the principle of natural selection, or the notion of unconscious motivation, or the organization of the means of production does not explain everything, not even everything human, but it still explains something; and our attention shifts to isolating just what that something is, to disentangling ourselves from a lot of pseudoscience to which, in the first flush of its celebrity, it has also given rise.


I think there is a lot of wisdom in that quote to ponder on when we start running with a new idea. It is fresh and exciting because it provides answers to problems that we have been contemplating, but it will definitely not be the answer to every problem we have been facing. I still love all of the changes that "kingdom of God" thinking has done for my Christian walk, but it does not answer everything. I propose that no theological, ecclesiological, or christological concept ever will.

Wednesday, October 24, 2007

Mixed Bag

I've dabbled with the idea writing a book quite often. Here are a few of the factors which motivate that desire:

* It would feed my warped sense of significance.
* I could make some extra money, maybe even a lot of it.
* I think God has gifted me as a writer.
* I think accomplishing a goal that big could empower me to achieve other goals.

Here are some of the reasons I have not:

* It requires a great amount of discipline and focus, of which I ahve little.
* There may be too much writing and non-biblical reading already, I suspect.
* I am aware of my warped desire for significance.
* I like confidence in my ability to accomplish a task that big.

This is just one example of how I am a mixed bag. My fleshly insecurites coexist with my Spirit-driven qualities. Maybe 'coexist' is not the right word, since they are at odds with each other. But they are still in my heart and mind. You can still find both of them behind so many decisions that I make.

Writing a book, preaching a good sermon, visiting the sick, reading to my children can all be motivated by either fleshly concerns or by the Spirit's call to 'Come, and die'. Sometimes simultaneously, it seems.

It's part of the process, I suppose. He takes more and more of my heart as tome goes on.
By one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.
Hebrews 10:14

Monday, October 22, 2007

Be the One!

"Now on his way to Jerusalem, Jesus traveled along the border between Samaria and Galilee. As he was going into a village, ten men who had leprosy met him. They stood at a distance and called out in a loud voice, "Jesus, Master, have pity on us!" When he saw them, he said, "Go, show yourselves to the priests." And as they went, they were cleansed. One of them, when he saw he was healed, came back, praising God in a loud voice. He threw himself at Jesus' feet and thanked him--and he was a Samaritan. Jesus asked, "Were not all ten cleansed? Where are the other nine? Was no one found to return and give praise to God except this foreigner?" Then he said to him, "Rise and go; your faith has made you well" (Luke 17:11-19 NIV).

When I encountered this passage the other day, I was challenged to be the one. Whatever it takes, I need to make sure that I notice the blessings bestowed upon me and come back to God to give thanks. Too often, I am part of the nine. I am blessed beyond comprehension with a great family, a house to live in, a nice job, food at every meal, tremendous friends, and so many more blessings that I have a blessed life day in and day out. It would almost be a fair assumption to say that anyone who has the ability to get online and read this could say the same.

Only one out of the nine came back and gave Jesus thanks for the healing. Too often we are part of the nine. Let us strive to be the one!

Friday, October 19, 2007

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

The Lottery Is Evil

We have all been in a convenience store and seen someone spend their food money (and perhaps rent money) on an one in a billion chance at becoming absurdly wealthy. It makes you angry. It makes you sad.

Talk about inequality. Someone becomes far too wealthy at the expense millions of people, most of whom cannot afford their habit.

I just read that last year state-run lotteries took in $56 billion dollars. There are only about 250 million people in the US. That is an average of $212 per person, or $1,060 for a family of five (like mine). Now subtract the number of citizens who are not playing, those with moral objections, those wealthy enough not to be lured by insane odds, those in the eight states where it is not legal, and those too young to play. And you begin to see that people are burying themselves for an impossible dream.

Of course, the dream itself is a lie. Many stories are coming out about how miserable lottery winners are, how many of them wish they had never won. So, many Americans are destroying themselves for an impossible chance at becoming miserable in a whole new way.

Part of the problem the media, and the undo attention we all pay to it. The "News" glorifies it, gushing at the ludicrous numbers the Lottery, and holding up the winners as some sort of heroes. They are wrong on both of these accounts.

It was recently that four people won $330 million in the Mega Millions jack pot. In fact, that is not really true. Really four people split $194 million dollars (pre-tax), while hundreds of thousands (my guess) of people lost hundreds of dollars.

Why $194 million rather than $330 million? The $330 million is based on a 26-year annuity. But the present value is only $194 million (I know, I know "only?") Greg Easterbrook explains it this way:

If your employer gave you a choice of a $500,000 salary this year or promised you $39,000 a year for 26 years, there is not one chance on Earth you would take the latter deal, or fall for the fiction that your salary should be called "$1 million," though that is $39,000 times 26.

Yet the "News" never mentions this. They are happy to use the numbers the lottery presents without any critical thinking. By the time they split it, took the present sum and paid taxes, they would be left with about $25 million. That's a lot, but it is not as sexy as "Four people win $330 million", is it?

The net result is terrible. In that Mega Millions drawing, an estimated 80 million $5 tickets lost. How many people is that who are left poorer so that 4 people can become wealthier than they can handle.

Or as Easterbrook says, "The $56 billion spent overall by Americans on legal gambling lotteries in 2006 mainly caused large numbers of citizens to become less well off so that very small numbers could become much too wealthy."

As a Christian, I cannot think of one legitimate excuse for having anything to do with this mess.

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Why did Jesus have to die on the cross?

I just found a post on why Jesus had to die on the cross.

Is there danger in personalizing it that much? Is it wrong to deal with the Old Testament sacrificial system in that way?

He made sense out of something I do not know if I have been able to make sense out of. It was always a topic I gave the "I don't know" answer to.

Monday, October 15, 2007

Influencing our Community for Christ

In our prayers on Sunday at church, we often pray, "Help us to be a positive influence in our community for Christ." I think it is probably a good thing to pray. But praying is not where it should stop; that is where it should begin.

We need to go out into the community, find where the people are, and love them where they are at. We do not need miraculous intervention to influence the community. We need a hunger to love, to be involved in the community, and to live selflessly. It's not a miracle we need. It is a life modeled after the sacrificial life of Christ.

Friday, October 12, 2007

Prayer Friday

Mem
Oh, how I love your law!
I meditate on it all day long.
Your commands make me wiser than my enemies,
for they are ever with me.
I have more insight than all my teachers,
for I meditate on your statutes.
I have more understanding than the elders,
for I obey your precepts.
I have kept my feet from every evil path
so that I might obey your word.
I have not departed from your laws,
for you yourself have taught me.
How sweet are your words to my taste,
sweeter than honey to my mouth!
I gain understanding from your precepts;
therefore I hate every wrong path.

Today, I'm praying for that craving.

By the way, my family is feeling much better. Thanks for the prayer.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Football and Faith


It's often a scary mix.


I can remember hanging my head in embarrassment when Reggie Lewis said from a pulpit that Orientals can turn a TV into a watch and Hispanics are good at pro-creating.


I can remember sighing when Deion Sanders said that Jesus told him not to pay his mechanic.


I can remember feeling a bit wheezy when I heard that Tony Dungy commanded his whole team to take a knee and recite the Lord's prayer right after they won the Super Bowl.


So I was a little worried when I found how outspoken QB Jon Kitna is about his faith. Writing that I see how silly it is. I know I have certainly done things that would make my fellow believers blush. But there is a stereo-type about zealous Christian football players. They are loud. They say silly things about how God favors their team. And they splinter their team, since the teams are a mixed bag of those who believe and those who don't.


But Kitna seems to be different. An article in ESPN the mag said this: Kitna is a fanatic for Christ, there's no question. He often prays on his way to the line of scrimmage, to calm himself. But it's clear to teammates that he sees God as more than a lucky rabbit's foot, which is why, while the vast majority of Lions prefer to keep their beliefs private, Kitna's public pronouncements don't grate on them. Posers and prima donnas splinter far more locker rooms than religion. And Kitna walks his talk without sanctimony.


He is consistent. "It's about production on the field and consistency off it," Kitna says. "What guys really have a problem with is inconsistency -- people who say one thing and do another. Hypocrites. Chameleons. My teammates learn pretty quick that this is who I am, every day and in every situation."


People respond to that. In fact, since becoming a Lion in March 2006, 20 Lions have come to Christ. I get that figure from the article. Think about that number. It's insane! There are only like 56 guys on an active roster and some of them were likely Christians already. Those numbers are more gaudy than his passing numbers.


The only thing that bums me out about Jon Kitna is that he won't be the Lions' QB in like 10 years when my son is searching for a hero in the sports world. He seems like a good one.

Mother Teresa' Struggle

TIME magazine did a story recently about a book called “Mother Teresa: Come Be My Light”. The book contains several private letters Mother Teresa sent to her confessor. The letters expose her most intimate struggles with doubt. This “dark night” of her soul was something she dealt with for virtually all of her adult life. And the letters contain a pretty raw depiction of her struggle.

"Lord, my God, who am I that You should forsake me? The Child of your Love--and now become as the most hated one--the one--You have thrown away as unwanted--unloved. I call, I cling, I want--and there is no One to answer--no One on Whom I can cling--no, No One.--Alone ... Where is my Faith--even deep down right in there is nothing, but emptiness & darkness--My God--how painful is this unknown pain--I have no Faith--I dare not utter the words & thoughts that crowd in my heart--& make me suffer untold agony.

So many unanswered questions live within me afraid to uncover them--because of the blasphemy--If there be God --please forgive me--When I try to raise my thoughts to Heaven--there is such convicting emptiness that those very thoughts return like sharp knives & hurt my very soul.--I am told God loves me--and yet the reality of darkness & coldness & emptiness is so great that nothing touches my soul. Did I make a mistake in surrendering blindly to the Call of the Sacred Heart?"


--ADDRESSED TO JESUS, AT THE SUGGESTION OF A CONFESSOR, UNDATED
It should be noted that “Kolodiejchuk, a senior Missionaries of Charity member, is her postulator, responsible for petitioning for her sainthood and collecting the supporting materials. (Thus far she has been beatified; the next step is canonization.) The letters in the book were gathered as part of that process.”

Some skeptics will see these letters as proof that Mother Teresa was hypocrite, preaching faith while having none. Kolodiejchuk sees it differently. He sees it as “proof of the faith-filled perseverance… her most spiritually heroic act.”

So, it's propaganda, but I tend to agree with Kolodiejchuk. It could be difficult to carry out the kind of ministry she did in Calcutta even with a constant felt closeness to Jesus. To fully surrender in obedience to Jesus even while feeling abandoned by him… well, that’s faith.

Had the TIME article not spelled out that argument well, I would have felt the need to do so here. However, it does. Therefore I’d like to move to a second observation about the article.

I think her suffering may not have been necessary, and it may have been the result of bad theology taught her by her church. I found this section enlightening:


[Her] letters are full of inner conflict about her accomplishments. Rather than simply giving all credit to God, Gottlieb observes, she agonizes incessantly that "any taking credit for her accomplishments--if only internally--is sinful" and hence, perhaps, requires a price to be paid… For Teresa, "an occasion for a modicum of joy initiated a significant quantity of misery," and her subsequent successes led her to perpetuate it.
I see here two stumbling blocks.

1. She saw any recognition of success as sinful pride.

This misconception did not belong to Mother Teresa alone. Nor is it monopolized by the Catholic Church. I have seen very talented people deny how obviously talented they are for fear of pride. I think this is a silliness that borders on false humility. If you have done something well, denying it would be more dishonest that humble. You do not need to be embarrassed about the blessings God gives. We have more than enough true reasons to be humble before God. We do not need fake ones.

Paul recognized his successes (2 Timothy 4:7-8 is one example that comes to mind).

I can see how such recognition could lead to pride, but I do not think the two are the same. We can recognize the good work we do, and be humbly grateful to God for gifting us and blessing our efforts.

God seems to have gifted Mother Teresa with some great talents and successes and then put her on stage for the world to see. And it seems that the more successes and attention she received, the guiltier she felt for recognizing them.

This would have been somewhat harmless silliness if it were not coupled with her second stumbling block.

2. Her sins required some further price to be paid.

When she felt she had sinful pride, she also felt the need to beat herself up for it. Instead of her success being an occasion for joy, it brought significant misery.
Even if she were guilty of pride, there was not price left for her to pay. Christ paid the price fully (Hebrews 10:10, 1 Peter 3:18) Having faith in him means trusting that his work is enough, that we do not need to add to make it enough.

I don’t know that these two stumbling blocks were the reason she felt so distant from Jesus. But these sort of untruths can lead a person down dangerous emotional paths. Feelings of guilt can quickly become feelings of loneliness.


That being said, I still think that she is a good example for those who go through periods of spiritual drought. And that includes all of us.


I just wish someone had been there to relieve her from what may have been needless suffering.

Obama's Faith

In response to Shannon's thoughts on my post the other day, I did some more research. I found this speech that Obama gave on June 28, 2006. I think it explains his faith more than any other comments that I could make. Here is an lengthy excerpt but the whole speech is great.

For some time now, there has been plenty of talk among pundits and pollsters that the political divide in this country has fallen sharply along religious lines. Indeed, the single biggest "gap" in party affiliation among white Americans today is not between men and women, or those who reside in so-called Red States and those who reside in Blue, but between those who attend church regularly and those who don't.

Conservative leaders have been all too happy to exploit this gap, consistently reminding evangelical Christians that Democrats disrespect their values and dislike their Church, while suggesting to the rest of the country that religious Americans care only about issues like abortion and gay marriage; school prayer and intelligent design.

Democrats, for the most part, have taken the bait. At best, we may try to avoid the conversation about religious values altogether, fearful of offending anyone and claiming that - regardless of our personal beliefs - constitutional principles tie our hands. At worst, there are some liberals who dismiss religion in the public square as inherently irrational or intolerant, insisting on a caricature of religious Americans that paints them as fanatical, or thinking that the very word "Christian" describes one's political opponents, not people of faith.

Now, such strategies of avoidance may work for progressives when our opponent is Alan Keyes. But over the long haul, I think we make a mistake when we fail to acknowledge the power of faith in people's lives -- in the lives of the American people -- and I think it's time that we join a serious debate about how to reconcile faith with our modern, pluralistic democracy.

And if we're going to do that then we first need to understand that Americans are a religious people. 90 percent of us believe in God, 70 percent affiliate themselves with an organized religion, 38 percent call themselves committed Christians, and substantially more people in America believe in angels than they do in evolution.

This religious tendency is not simply the result of successful marketing by skilled preachers or the draw of popular mega-churches. In fact, it speaks to a hunger that's deeper than that - a hunger that goes beyond any particular issue or cause.

Each day, it seems, thousands of Americans are going about their daily rounds - dropping off the kids at school, driving to the office, flying to a business meeting, shopping at the mall, trying to stay on their diets - and they're coming to the realization that something is missing. They are deciding that their work, their possessions, their diversions, their sheer busyness, is not enough.

They want a sense of purpose, a narrative arc to their lives. They're looking to relieve a chronic loneliness, a feeling supported by a recent study that shows Americans have fewer close friends and confidants than ever before. And so they need an assurance that somebody out there cares about them, is listening to them - that they are not just destined to travel down that long highway towards nothingness.

And I speak with some experience on this matter. I was not raised in a particularly religious household, as undoubtedly many in the audience were. My father, who returned to Kenya when I was just two, was born Muslim but as an adult became an atheist. My mother, whose parents were non-practicing Baptists and Methodists, was probably one of the most spiritual and kindest people I've ever known, but grew up with a healthy skepticism of organized religion herself. As a consequence, so did I.

It wasn't until after college, when I went to Chicago to work as a community organizer for a group of Christian churches, that I confronted my own spiritual dilemma.

I was working with churches, and the Christians who I worked with recognized themselves in me. They saw that I knew their Book and that I shared their values and sang their songs. But they sensed that a part of me that remained removed, detached, that I was an observer in their midst.

And in time, I came to realize that something was missing as well -- that without a vessel for my beliefs, without a commitment to a particular community of faith, at some level I would always remain apart, and alone.

And if it weren't for the particular attributes of the historically black church, I may have accepted this fate. But as the months passed in Chicago, I found myself drawn - not just to work with the church, but to be in the church.

For one thing, I believed and still believe in the power of the African-American religious tradition to spur social change, a power made real by some of the leaders here today. Because of its past, the black church understands in an intimate way the Biblical call to feed the hungry and cloth the naked and challenge powers and principalities. And in its historical struggles for freedom and the rights of man, I was able to see faith as more than just a comfort to the weary or a hedge against death, but rather as an active, palpable agent in the world. As a source of hope.

And perhaps it was out of this intimate knowledge of hardship -- the grounding of faith in struggle -- that the church offered me a second insight, one that I think is important to emphasize today.

Faith doesn't mean that you don't have doubts.

You need to come to church in the first place precisely because you are first of this world, not apart from it. You need to embrace Christ precisely because you have sins to wash away - because you are human and need an ally in this difficult journey.

It was because of these newfound understandings that I was finally able to walk down the aisle of Trinity United Church of Christ on 95th Street in the Southside of Chicago one day and affirm my Christian faith. It came about as a choice, and not an epiphany. I didn't fall out in church. The questions I had didn't magically disappear. But kneeling beneath that cross on the South Side, I felt that I heard God's spirit beckoning me. I submitted myself to His will, and dedicated myself to discovering His truth.

That's a path that has been shared by millions upon millions of Americans - evangelicals, Catholics, Protestants, Jews and Muslims alike; some since birth, others at certain turning points in their lives. It is not something they set apart from the rest of their beliefs and values. In fact, it is often what drives their beliefs and their values.

And that is why that, if we truly hope to speak to people where they're at - to communicate our hopes and values in a way that's relevant to their own - then as progressives, we cannot abandon the field of religious discourse.

Because when we ignore the debate about what it means to be a good Christian or Muslim or Jew; when we discuss religion only in the negative sense of where or how it should not be practiced, rather than in the positive sense of what it tells us about our obligations towards one another; when we shy away from religious venues and religious broadcasts because we assume that we will be unwelcome - others will fill the vacuum, those with the most insular views of faith, or those who cynically use religion to justify partisan ends.

In other words, if we don't reach out to evangelical Christians and other religious Americans and tell them what we stand for, then the Jerry Falwells and Pat Robertsons and Alan Keyeses will continue to hold sway.

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Quote Tuesday - On the morality of Video Games

All quotes from this NY Times article entitled, “Thou Shalt Not Kill, Except in a Popular Video Game at Church”

Across the country, hundreds of ministers and pastors desperate to reach young congregants have drawn concern and criticism through their use of an unusual recruiting tool: the immersive and violent video game Halo.

Tim Foster, 12, explained the game’s allure: “It’s just fun blowing people up.”

Once they come for the games, Gregg Barbour, the youth minister of the church said, they will stay for his Christian message. “We want to make it hard for teenagers to go to hell,” Mr. Barbour wrote in a letter to parents at the church.

Austin Brown, 16, said, “We play Halo, take a break and have something to eat, and have a lesson,” explaining that the pastor tried to draw parallels “between God and the devil.”

Monday, October 8, 2007

"I am confident that we can create a Kingdom right here on Earth."

For the article my thoughts are referring to, go check out CNN's article Obama: GOP doesn't own faith and values.

My initial thoughts upon hearing that we can create a kingdom here on earth were ones of excitement and anticipation. I love hearing those thoughts expressed. Finally, more are starting to realize that Christianity is not just about getting our ticket punched so that we can get into heaven. It is more than that. The message of the kingdom of God is the gospel, and it is starting to gain more popularity.

But then it disturbed me. Is the kingdom going to be brought about through political means? Will the kingdom of God be brought about by a politician? My impulsive reaction to those questions is a negative; however, I do not see why a politician cannot be used by God to bring more fully his kingdom here on earth. He was expressing those thoughts in a church and not in the White House. Forcing the kingdom and changing people's hearts into being citizens of the kingdom is a very dangerous line that should not be crossed, but it seems that God often resides in that which is dangerous.

"Obama noted that he was pleased leaders in the evangelical community like T.D. Jakes and Rick Warren were beginning to discuss social justice issues like AIDS and poverty in ways evangelicals were not doing before."

I am also pleased that pastors are beginning to discuss that social justice issues matter. The problem I have is that one political party focuses on issues of social justice while the other party focuses on issues of social morality. I would like a party that did not separate the two. It should not be an either/or but a both/and. We should not have to go into the ballot box and vote for one or the other.

The thing I find most perplexing is that I have to decide when I vote what is more important: social justice or social morality. I hate making that decision. It is not a decision that should have to be made. And I really do not know how to make it.

Friday, October 5, 2007

Prayer Friday

As I mentioned, my family is sick. Just as Ramiah is finding a workable sleeping patern, Hannah and Eli have been up all night for the last three nights. Each has a fever. Cindie does too. Please, pray for wellness.

With all that happening, I stayed home Wednesday and Thursday from work. This means that I am way behind. I also have a wedding to do Saturday. Please, pray that I get it all done in a fashion that honors Him.

Anything I can pray about for you?

Thursday, October 4, 2007

Celebrity Faith

(sorry for the delay, the family is sick...)

I've read two interesting articles about faith recently. One was in TIME magazine, and the other was in ESPN The Magazine. These are not my normal sources for spiritual thought, but they delivered the goods.

The two articles were about two very different believers who both had the tricky role of living as celebrity Christians.

More to come...

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Quote Tuesday - the nature of existence

“Existence is a strange thing. It falls under the surface, under all the things I throw on top of it until one day it’s forgotten with everything else that used to be important, if only I could remember. It becomes an assumed separate reality if it’s identified at all, not as important as tomorrow or what I will do with today. But it continues nonetheless beneath the life I think I am creating.

Then one day it comes to the surface and becomes the one thing I can’t hide myself from anymore (but still no one else can see). All the other layers have been pulled away or broken, and all that’s left is the unbearable presence of existence with nothing to lessen it. It feels heavier than all the distractions put together.

It is better to choose despair than expedients (Kierkegaard). But I wonder if we ever really choose for ourselves until one of the two is offered to us (you don’t refuse a gift). Then even life itself can seem like a poor alternative to coping, it seems so small and so much of me.

I wonder if this is all my life is: a default survival and some days not even that. It seems different from what it was supposed to be and from what I asked for.

Maybe I don’t want it anymore.”

A Delicate Fade, Ben Devries, p. 25-26

Monday, October 1, 2007

Who is our Watchman?

My thoughts after reading Ezekiel 33:1-9.

Who is our watchman now? It seems like a question that is trying to move responsibility from ourselves onto another. A response similar in nature to the question that was asked of Jesus, “Who is my neighbor?” His reply to that was that anyone we encounter is our neighbor. I think the same approach could be taken to the question of “Who is our watchman?” Everyone is each other's watchman (or watchwoman). If someone sees some incoming danger approaching, it is their responsibility to give warning. You are my watchman. I am your watchman. We, as followers of Christ, are the world's watchmen. It is not a responsibility that we can shirk off and give to someone else.

We see in this passage in Ezekiel that sharing the gospel is our responsibility. If we do not share, then the responsibility for the lack of others being disciples is on our hands. We will receive the punishment that the person that did not become a disciple will receive if we do not warn them.

Consider this story told by Bernard L. Brown, Jr., former president of the Kennestone Regional Health Care System in the state of Georgia.

Brown once worked in a hospital where a patient knocked over a cup of water, which spilled on the floor beside the patient's bed. The patient was afraid he might slip on the water if he got out of the bed, so he asked a nurse's aide to mop it up. The patient didn't know it, but the hospital policy said that small spills were the responsibility of the nurse's aides while large spills were to be mopped up by the hospital's housekeeping group.

The nurse's aide decided the spill was a large one and she called the housekeeping department. A housekeeper arrived and declared the spill a small one. An argument followed.

"It's not my responsibility," said the nurse's aide, "because it's a large puddle." The housekeeper did not agree. "Well, it's not mine," she said, "the puddle is too small."

The exasperated patient listened for a time, then took a pitcher of water from his night table and poured the whole thing on the floor. "Is that a big enough puddle now for you two to decide?" he asked. It was, and that was the end of the argument.


We oftentimes do not like to take responsibility for our own actions let alone the actions of others. But the Bible is clear that we are responsible for the failure of others when it comes to whether they follow Christ or not if we have not done our duty as a watchman.

“What a sharp contrast with a scene that occurred on a New York street nearly two decades before. Kitty Genovese was slowly and brutally stabbed to death. At least thirty-eight of her neighbors witnessed the attack and heard her screams. In the course of the 90-minute episode, her attacker was actually frightened away, then he returned to finish her off. Yet not once during that period did any neighbor assist her, or even telephone the police. The implications of this tragic event shocked America, and it stimulated two young psychologists, Darly and Latane, to study the conditions under which people are or are not willing to help others in an emergency. In essence, they concluded that responsibility is diffused. The more people present in an emergency situation, the less likely it is that any one of them will offer help. This is popularly called the "bystander effect." (In the actual experiment, when one bystander was present, 85 percent offered help. When two were present, 62 percent offered help. When five were present, then it decreased to 31 percent.)”

From the book Social Psychology in the Seventies


We, as watchmen, suffer from the bystander effect. We think it is the person sitting in the pew behind us, beside us, across the aisle, or standing in the pulpit that is responsible. We constantly struggle to place the responsibility on someone else, but each one of us is responsible. Let us take seriously the call to be each other's watchman.