Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Advent: Love Sermon Part 2

The question is not, “What kind of Savior did God send?” We know what kind. The kind who loves and brings light. The question is, “When people go looking for the Savior, what do they find?” Do they find the child born of love?

Because if the world finds a Savior that is of our making, they will be sorely disappointed. Unfortunately, I think people find a Savior of our own construction and not the true light. They find a Savior that we have twisted and turned into a cosmic policeman who comes and judges with the sword. They find a cruel, judgmental God instead of a loving, forgiving God. And so people think, “Why would I follow that sort of Savior? I’m clearly in the wrong place.” And you know what, they would be right. They are in the wrong place, because we have led them to the wrong place. Paul makes this amazing metaphor that puts us right into the Christmas story. He says the following in Philippians 2:14-16:
“Do everything without complaining or arguing, so that you may become blameless and pure, children of God without fault in a crooked and depraved generation, in which you shine like stars in the universe as you hold out the word of life.”

Did you catch that? He calls us stars. Stars that are shining as we hold out the word of life. A star led the Magi to the newborn king. Stars guided sailors across the ocean. Stars are every bit a source of light as they are a guide. They are lights, beacons. And Paul tells us that when we live a certain way of life we become those stars. When we live without complaining about the state of affairs and work towards bettering the situation. When we don’t argue with one another about petty things that detract from movement of the kingdom. When we are blameless and pure, not hypocrites who complain about the evil in the world but contribute to it through our own sins. When we live in that sort of way then Paul says we become those beacons. We become like Christ as a source of light, life, and love.

As others learn of the hope, peace, joy, and love you have in your life in Christ, they will recognize their need for Him. Like the star that led the way of the Magi to the Savior, we lead people as well. We lead them to an encounter with the God of the Universe. Our job, as stars, is not to judge. Or job, as stars, is not to condemn and berate people. Our job, as stars, is to lead people to experience the Savior for themselves and find out just why he came to this earth. To find out what we already know – that Jesus came to this world for love.

Advent is a time of preparing our hearts, minds, and lives for the coming of the Savior. And I wonder today, how many of us are ready to receive him? Are you ready for this kind of Jesus?

When God offers grace and forgiveness for your past mistakes are you ready?
When God arrives to do a new and exciting work, are you ready?
When God challenges you to step up and do things that you don’t feel comfortable with and aren’t particularly talented in, are you ready?
When God challenges you to commit your time and resources for the ministry of the kingdom, are you ready?
When God challenges you to do more than complain, but work towards the betterment of this church, are you ready?
When God tells you to love your neighbor – including and especially your enemies, are you ready?
When God tells you to give to people as they have need – things like encouragement and acceptance – are you ready?

Are you ready for this kind of Jesus? This Jesus who tells us to let our light shine so brightly that it brings life and love. Are you ready?

Is the world ready? Is this world ready for a Jesus who doesn’t regulate morality with the sword but through love? I believe the answer is a resounding “Yes!!!!” The world is more than ready. Romans says that the creation has been groaning and crying out. The world is ready. But this isn’t the sort of Savior they are expecting. Most of the world when they hear of Savior they think of a political one. When they think of the message of Christianity they think of hypocritical bigots. So let’s give them what they don’t expect.
Let’s give them life – a new, full life that Jesus promises.
Let’s give them light – hope, joy and peace in this dark world.
Let’s give them love – the same sort of love that God extended to us and that we have already accepted.

And let’s give it to them not just at Christmas when it seems appropriate, but all through the year. It has been said: "The stars do not shout; they only shine." Any Christian, however obscure, can be a light to those around and thus attract and guide humanity to a loving encounter with the God of the Universe. Jesus says simply, "Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good works and glorify your Father in heaven."

Monday, December 29, 2008

Advent: Love Sermon Part 1

I’ve always wondered what the Magi expected when they went searching for “the one who is to be born King of the Jews.” I am not sure if they even expected a baby. But even if they did, he sure didn’t seem like royalty. I also wonder what they thought when they came to the place where Jesus was. I can imagine the scene as these travelers who have followed a star in the sky from a distant land finally come to the house that holds this person about whom prophecies foretold. And as they get closer they think, “This is not the best part of town. Are we sure our coordinates are correct?” And one of the others says, “We’re both looking at the same blinding light in the sky, right? Well then yes, this is the place.” And as they park their camels in front of this modest abode, they become even more uncomfortable leaving their nice rides out front of the house in full view of what looks like some suspicious teenagers. But, the star is right above this spot, so they can’t exactly disagree. And as they knock on the door, a poor woman answers, whom they assume is the maid, but come to find out she is actually the mother, Mary.

One Magi looks at the others and says, “Wise man conference, right now.” They go and huddle in the corner and are completely dumbfounded by being confronted with the unexpected. They expected a prince – a king in training – with all the royal accessories like a golden crib, a diamond studded pacifier, purple silk diapers, and a crystal milk bottle. What they got was, to put it nicely, a hovel. They found a baby with stained cloth diapers in a wooden crib with straw to keep him warm. A mother who was better suited to be a handmaid than a Queen. And a father whose rough, calloused hands told of a difficult way of life rather than one of kingly luxury. And through their quick deliberation they come to the conclusion that the coordinates to their searching are correct, but their expectations were not. And so they reevaluate their approach and present their kingly gifts to this homely baby that defied their expectations.

From then on, this Messiah continued to defy expectations. The Jews sought a political savior and instead they get a spiritual one. They hoped for a reigning King and instead they got a crucified criminal.

I wonder what we expect when we think of God entering into this world? Do we expect a judge who will punish the sinners who have ruined this world? Do we expect an enforcer who strictly imposes the letter of the law on his followers? Do we want a warrior king, someone who will fight for us? Because if we do, we will be sorely disappointed. Jesus is a lover, not a fighter. One of our most cherished passages of Scripture, John 3:16, clearly testifies to this – For God so loved the world. A love born of God’s connectedness with us as God’s creation. We stand as God’s treasured possession.

In love God sent Jesus into the world. In love Jesus turned the other cheek and endured scorn. In love Jesus died on the cross for us. In love Jesus judges the world, but not as we would judge. We judge with the sword. We think justice involves punishment. But that is not what John 3:17 says constitutes judgment: “For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.” Jesus did not come for condemnation but for salvation. This king, this Savior, does not wield a sword; he wields a staff, and like a shepherd gently prods his people back. Any expectations of God as a cruel judge melt before the heat of his love. Yes, there is judgment, but Love is the judge – not the sword.

To help illustrate this concept, John uses the imagery of light piercing the darkness. He says in verses 19-21, “Light has come into the world, but humanity loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God.”

Light can’t help but illuminate darkness. The very properties inherent within light accomplish this. Light is not attacking darkness in some violent way. Light just dispels darkness because light is more powerful. Have you ever noticed how far a little light goes? In complete darkness just a glimmer of light can be overpowering as our eyes adjust. In the same way, the Light of Jesus can’t help but disperse the darkness of sin. That is just what Jesus does. John 1 says that in Jesus was life, and that life was the light of men. It is in Jesus’ very nature to bring light and life and love.

Some people can’t help but be nice, caring, loving. We often say that is second nature to them. There is some truth in that, but not what we may think. This sort of nature is not just a trait that they received at birth. Some people have cultivated a certain nature of love. They have replaced their selfish nature with an inherently loving, self-sacrificing one. Maybe that is supposed to be all of our natures as our selfish one is replaced with a second, renewed, spiritual one. Maybe we are all supposed to be transformed into the kind of people who naturally love first because it is an overflow of who we are. Maybe we are all supposed to have the same nature of life, light, and love.

Thursday, December 25, 2008

Christmas, Ahmadinejad, America, and Christ

Iran's President Ahmadinejad gave a speech proclaiming
"If Christ was on Earth today undoubtedly he would stand with the people in opposition to bullying, ill-tempered and expansionist powers...If Christ was on Earth today undoubtedly he would hoist the banner of justice and love for humanity to oppose warmongers, occupiers, terrorists and bullies the world over. If Christ was on Earth today undoubtedly he would fight against the tyrannical policies of prevailing global economic and political systems, as He did in His lifetime."

I think his reading of the New Testament is a little skewed. I never really saw Jesus attack political authorities. He did go after the religious establishment, but not the political leaders.

If Christ was on Earth today, he undoubtedly would teach love your neighbor and give unto the United States what is the United States' and to God what is God's.

Monday, December 22, 2008

The Christmas Story - a work in progress

I have been working on a project off and on for about 5 years. I have never been overlay satisfied with it, but am still not. Part of my dissatisfaction stems from my weakness in writing fantasy fiction. The other part stems from rewriting such a powerful passage of scripture. So, I put this out there and am open to your honest critics. What can I do to make it better? Should I just turn the project over to someone else who can write it better? Let me know. So here it is:

The Christmas Story on LSD according to “The Apocalypse”

(I recommend reading Revelation 12 before reading my rendition)


Though the sun rose each morning, the days in Jerusalem were dark. Little joy or hope could be found. This place did not live up to its name, “City of Peace” because for many years Jerusalem lived under the shadow of the great beast from the sea – the dragon. As dragons go, this was no ordinary mythic creature. He was the most powerful dragon that ever lived. He could blot out the sun when he flew in front of it and could send stars flying out of the galaxy or crashing towards earth with the sweep of his tail. His appearance was unlike any normal dragon’s form. This gigantic beast was colored red as though dripping in blood. He had not one head but seven. Each head had ten horns and each head had a crown. The heads were the source of his power and the authority of his crowns put down any contenders.

The dragon’s official name was Herod. Of course, those who had heard of his cruelty called him Hasatan—the Adversary—which is what we shall call him. Hasatan ruled the land with an iron fist. He kept his brand of “peace” by spreading fear and violence. Any resistance was met with execution. In fact, Hasatan was so paranoid about people usurping his throne that he consumed his wife with fire and devoured his 3 offspring for fear that they were plotting against him.

Indeed, the days were dark. But in the midst of this bleak situation, a light began to shine. This light began as just a spark and almost flickered and died out. Nevertheless, when darkness seems so complete, little is required to bring hope.
A woman became pregnant with child. Ordinarily, such an event was worth celebrating, but this was no ordinary child and no ordinary woman. Her appearance was startling and looking at her was like looking into the light of the sun. Her clothes were the sun and her shoes the moon. Upon her head rested a crown with 12 stars. She was indeed royalty as she stood for the matriarch of the 12 tribes of Israel. Through her and her offspring the tribes would be united and all the earth would know a time of peace that had not been known since the expulsion of humankind from Eden. The child would fulfill the prophecy spoken by the oracle Y’shiah:

“On that day
Yahweh with his cruel and great and strong sword
will punish Leviathan the fleeing serpent,
Leviathan the twisting serpent,
and he will kill the dragon that is in the sea.”

Once the child destroyed the power of the dragon this child of prophecy would rule the land not with fear and violence but with an iron scepter. After all, the child’s authority stemmed from his rightful place as God of the Land not from wars waged against all opposition.

So when Hasatan heard of the birth of one who was claming rights to kingship in the land, he burned with anger and acted out of fear. Gathering his minions, he enacted a plan to destroy any hope of a Savior. Children bearing any likeness to this prophetic figure were immediately slaughtered. The blood of the massacre spilled into the streets. Cries of great pain and sorrow erupted throughout the land as the death toll grew.

But elsewhere, in the long forgotten town known as “The House of Bread” the matriarch cried out in a different kind of pain. Her son, the foretold figure, was born into this world. In keeping with the prophecy she named him Yeshua—Yahweh Saves—fully aware of his salvific purpose in this world. Frightened that her son would suffer the same fate as so many other children, she fled to a place where this sea monster serpent could not find her. She and baby escaped into the Land of the Sun where they hid out of the dragon’s reach until his fury had subsided.

When they returned from the desert the baby was no longer a helpless infant. No force could stand up against his strength and power. Everywhere Hasatan had enacted his cruelty, Yeshua rectified the bleak condition by healing the mangled, freeing captives, and destroying the oppressive control that were marks of the Dragon’s regime. Each day as the spark of light grew and made its way into his kingdom, Hasatan grew angrier and more scared. And so he enacted a plan to finish the evil plot he began so long ago.

Eventually, Yeshua and Hasatan met on the Hill of the Skull, Golgatha, either to prove the prophecy or destroy all hope. Yeshua took the best shot Hasatan had to give, and not only survived but destroyed Hasatan’s greatest weapon—fear of death. As the light of life enfolded Yeshua, the epic battle was over. With victory in hand, Yeshua ascended into heaven. But just as a spark of fire sets a forest ablaze, so the flicker of light emanating from Yeshua began to crowd out the darkness. No longer was the gloom of despair over the land. The light of hope radiated from all who heard the news.

The great dragon was defeated, but evil was not destroyed completely. Hoping to salvage some remnant of power and control, he and his minions stormed the gates of heaven seeking to cripple Yeshua’s power. But they were met by the Commander of Heaven’s Army, Michael, with the Army of Yahweh in tow. Heaven’s army turned Hasatan’s dark ensemble away, casting them back to the earth to wander around in defeat, hoping to recruit enough followers to once again stage a coup against the Kingdom of Light. He continues to battle but has no chance for victory. For the dawn has broken and the Son Shines!

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Read Through The Bible In A Year

Here is a good reading plan that you can print out to read through the Bible in a year.

No reason to wait till the new year. Go ahead and get a head start.

Monday, December 15, 2008

Joy to the World

Seeing as this week is the week of Joy in the Advent season, and I am busy preparing for a German proficiency test (prayers desired), here is a video for your entertainment and edification. If this doesn't get you in the "Christmas spirit", I don't know what will.

Friday, December 12, 2008

The Great Temptation

Now that I am moving to a position that is paid through fundraising, I find myself tempted to make decisions to please others (and raise funds) rather than do what I would normally do.

The major one is on deciding what church to attend in Oxford. When we visited, I really connected with the church we visited. I spent a year visiting churches three years ago. I know what it is like to experience a church for the first time. I know what I am looking for in a church. When I was hunting for a community to become a part of, none of the churches seem to have more than a few of the points I was looking for. I am conscious that I am overly critical, but this church hit the spot. It's the church I was praying to find three years ago. It just happened to be three hours away.

One of the key goals in my campus ministry will be to train the students how to function in a church, whether that is a house church or a traditional church is not important, but being part of a church outside of the campus ministry is an important element of discipling. In four years, they will be out of college. Having had a good time in campus ministry will have helped them remain faithful in college, but it will not have laid the foundation of life in a church body that will be essential for the rest of their lives. I do not want to ignore that.

Because this church is nondenominational and not Church of Christ/Christian Church, I began to wonder whether deciding to go there would hurt my fundraising. I came to the conclusion that the question of whether it will be good for fundraising or not should not influence the decision of where we go to church. Despite the fact that I will have tons of fellowship and interaction with other believers through the campus ministry, my family will not. The church needs to be an extension of my training up my children into who God wants them to be and it should exemplify what God wants his church to be. I want my children to follow Christ with all of their being and to believe that the body assembled is important to the world. Many people think that the church is irrelevant; that is the result of many churches being irrelevant. I want my kids to see God's glory shining through His collected people. A healthy church helps in doing that.

Combining my desire to introduce students to a healthy church environment and my responsibility to raise my family in the Lord, I am left with deciding that I will do what the Lord wants rather than to please potential partners who need to believe in me and my ministry.

This is the biggest example of this temptation in my life, but it is cropping up all the time. I have decided to take the stubborn road of just doing what I think is best in regards to my ministry and my life rather than doing what I think will make me most appealing to others for raising money. It does become somewhat more difficult in that fundraising is part of my ministry. The partners I find through fundraising are people I want to diligently pray for and minister to if they need it. I will not be able to do the ministry without them. But I need to just focus on God and what he wants of me. If I do something to please men rather than God, I begin to place my trust in men and my witty wisdom. If I follow Him, He will provide.

It's not about pleasing myself or others; it's about pleasing God.

Rich Mullins wrote in his song, My One Thing:

Save me from those things that might distract me
Please take them away and purify my heart
I don't want to lose the eternal for the things that are passing
'Cause what will I have when the world is gone
If it isn't for the love that goes on and on with
My one thing
You're my one thing
And the pure in heart shall see God

Thursday, December 11, 2008

Nooma

World renowned New Testament scholar, Ben Witherington III has a review of both Rob Bell and the next segment of his Nooma videos. I found it to be fair and insightful. Check it out for yourself here.

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Christmas Revolution (revisited)

Last January I posted the following thoughts on how to celebrate Christmas. I decided to re-post it, including the comments. I know that at least I needed the reminder.

The Caroland family is coming off the busiest, toughest Christmas season to date. It was too much. Our kids are still recovering from the relentless celebrating.

There is so much that just is not good for kids about Christmas. There is too much sugar, too much stimulation, too much stuff, too many activities and festivities, and too little rest. The expectations are placed too high, or at least misplaced. Therefore, the inevitable disappointment brings them too low.

I'd like to say that emphasizing Christ's birth solves the problem, but practically speaking, it only adds to pressure with more expectations and things to do.

We try hard as parents to provide our children with a special Christmas experience, but the result is too often worn-down and sick children who crack at the drop of the hat. Then we are frustrated that they are acting spoiled and ungrateful. But really, what should we expect after all of that? Are we the models of joy and contentment come December 27th?

So, I have come up with a few ways to turn that around. Some of these things have been field tested by us. The others will be next year, Lord willing.

1. Have yourself a very little Christmas- I know, "Good luck with that." There are too many expectations and responsibilities placed on you by family, schools, church, neighbors and friends. However, part of being a healthy responsible adult is learning to say 'no'. And your kids need you to do that.

Can Christmas be meaningful for you and your family if you skip out on some ceremonies even if they are part of your tradition? Yes, in fact, it may be more more meaningful if they are given rest and time to digest it all.

And the stuff. It's fun for us to buy stuff for our kids. It's fun to watch them open things. But there is a principle I have observed. The more stuff they get, the less they can enjoy any of it. It's overwhelming. Things they would have loved any other time of the year get lost in the pile.

Sam suggested three presents be the number. That's what Jesus got, after all. I'm not sure what to do about the presents from everyone else, though.

2. Teach them to let go- Before Christmas and birthdays, we have the kids go through their toys and fill up a garbage bag to be given away. We donate them to Goodwill or some other place. We even encourage them to give away toys they like. In this way, toys lose the grip they have on their hearts a little, they learn to be concerned for others, and we have less things to care for. This has worked well for us.

3. Share the thrill of impact giving- Our kids already like giving. Hannah could not wait for her mom to see that porcelain angel she got her from the dollar store. And that's good.

But anyone who has been used by God to fill a need knows how much more exciting that is than knocking down a Christmas list filled with people who have all they need.

Next year, Hannah and Eli (if he is mature enough by then) will be choosing a way to give something to those with nothing. Perhaps some livestock or something like that.

I'd love your suggestions while it is fresh in your mind.

3 comments:

Sam said...

Excellent post and ideas reflecting much of what we discussed during our visit. 2 and 3 especially are great as it reminds us that God's blessings (gifts) are not just for our enjoyment but are to be used to bless the rest of the word.

In regard to presents from others, might I propose something that is often done or funerals. Many families have people donate money or gifts to a cause in honor of the deceased. So, when people ask what to get your kid, have then donate to the Worldvision gifts pack that you linked in #3. Sure, it is not as fulfilling to the giver as seeing your child unwrap that new car or doll, but also imagine saying to your child - "Now we can buy a family a cow instead of just a chicken" or something like that. It builds excitement and accomplishes what you propose.


merry said...

Mike and I have opted out of many Christmas activities and traditions for most of our marriage for the reasons you listed and some additional ones. We weren't sure how well that was going to work when we became parents, but I think we survived fairly well all things considered.

We decided that we would give our son one largish present that would be meaningful or useful in some way and a couple stocking stuffer type gifts. We ended up getting him a shelving unit for his bedroom. Other people still bombarded him with toys and clothes, but we did request a number of books from the grandparents since he loves to read and be read to, and we can use those throughout the coming year.

We didn't have a special time of "let's give away stuff", but we go through toys and clothes pretty regularly and weed things out all the time.

Having a 9-year old, we let our son decide on whether or not to participate in several traditions. We told him that we want the holidays to be a special time, but we want to be able to focus on the activities that are really special to us, so if he wanted to do it, we would, and if he didn't, we wouldn't. He actually said no to most of the things, and I don't think any of us felt like we missed out on anything.


Julie said...

I love sharing with other's what we've decided for our family. We've only done it two years so far and it's been different each year already.

We give gifts to each other in three categories. God provides for our needs, God delights in us and wants to bless us, God wants a growing relationship with us.

Examples:
God provides - gloves, socks
Delights - toys
Relationship - movie, cd, new Bible, book about Godly character.

I like this format for us because we don't focus on the number of gifts but the reason for them. Also, it helps the kids remember what they got and why they got it. I also wrap them specific to their category. Provides has birds on it. God takes care of the sparrows kind of thing. It's a lot of fun!

Also, this year we did Advent. It was so awesome! Each night at dinner we'd light a candle and read just one verse. It was the same verse each time until the next week began. So great! I'm excited to expand on it as the kids grow older.

You know, we're not very good though having our kids give. That's something to work on for sure. Last year we gave our oldest money on Christmas morning to us as service. We forgot this year :)


Monday, December 8, 2008

Praying Over SUVs

I do not know what to think of this story. A Detroit preacher prays over three SUVs, one from each of the Detroit car makers.

SUVs at altar, Detroit church prays for a bailout

Part of me thinks about all of the other people that are already struggling in our nation and around the world. It seems like they are playing second fiddle to the automakers.

Also, an SUV really is not the symbol of responsible caretaker to the environment. I wonder if they should have prayed over some of the hybrids rather than the kings of the gas guzzlers.

But God does care about the automakers although they have been living disproportionately better than other Americans for the last forty years despite doing the same sort of labor.

I'm confused on what to think. Anyone have any guidance?

The Song of Your Life

I am finishing up some things for this semester (a paper, learning German) so here is a humorous video with a interesting conclusion. I thought it was appropriate for this Christmas season.

Thursday, December 4, 2008

There Is A Good

I have noticed lately that our society's newest fad belief is that good does not exist. This belief is not all that new in the history of mankind, but it seems to be gaining ground in our culture. Video games are being filled with decisions where all the options available to a player are a bad choice or a very bad choice. There is no good option. This message is not contained only in the medium that probably has the most influence on the teenage minds in our nation.

It manifests itself in politics where we usually vote for the lesser of two evils. We settle on the church we attend because it is most in line with what we want to be part of despite its faults. One of the workers at Clem's believes that people only do loving things for selfish reasons. We never seem to have a choice between that which is good and that which is evil.

Chris Hedges, a Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist and a frequent guest on NPR, stated when asked about war being a moral endeavor, "The world rarely offers us a choice between the moral and the immoral. It's usually a choice between the immoral and the more immoral. That's why moral decision making is so tough."

I struggle with this concept. Reality screams that life is not a choice between good and evil. We are inundated between choosing the lesser of two evils every day. I can see the sense in believing there really is no good. Life does not appear black and white. My struggle might be the result of having allowed myself to be absorbed into our culture rather than to stand as a witness in it.

This belief that there are only lesser degrees of evil is going to be a prevailing thought that we are going to have to tackle in the coming years if we are going to help people become disciples of Christ. We must know and have our lives testify that there is good.

"In the same way, let your light shine before men, that they may see your good deeds and praise your Father in heaven" (Matthew 5:16).


Now a man came up to Jesus and asked, "Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?" "Why do you ask me about what is good?" Jesus replied. "There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, obey the commandments."

"Which ones?" the man inquired. Jesus replied, " 'Do not murder, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not give false testimony, honor your father and mother,' and 'love your neighbor as yourself.' " "All these I have kept," the young man said. "What do I still lack?" Jesus answered, "If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me." When the young man heard this, he went away sad, because he had great wealth.

Then Jesus said to his disciples, "I tell you the truth, it is hard for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven. Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God." When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and asked, "Who then can be saved?" Jesus looked at them and said, "With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible." (Matthew 19:16-26)


I must find the good path and walk in it, yet the only good I can do is reflect God's goodness through the life I live. There is good. The question is whether we are faithful enough to sacrifice our own desires and bring it about.

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Trembling


"Fearing the Lord is about having a healthy respect for him."

That has been the prevailing teaching on fearing the Lord, in my experience anyway. But as a logophile (I had to look that one up), that has never set well.

I do not fear police, but I do a have a healthy respect for their ability to penalize my behavior. My son does not have a 'healthy respect' for monsters. He fears them. There is a substantial difference. If the text meant healthy respect, I'm guessing that it could have done a better job expressing that.

I am not just a lover of words, I am also a lover of God's Word. And the above theory fairs no better there. Encounters with God consistently involve people completely paralyzed by 'healthy respect' to point that they die, become like dead people, or think they will die for it.

Then there passages like Jeremiah 5:22 "Should you not fear me?" declares the LORD. Should you not tremble in my presence?" Trembling does not result from respect, but from fear.

The motive behind the theory is legit. God is love, not a monster. What do we fear of Him? How do we fear him and have faith in what he has said about forgiveness and sonship?

Good questions, but twisting what fear is does not solve it.

Perhaps we should look again at what we are taught about fearing God.

"The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and discipline." (Proverbs 1:7)

Did you notice that fear is the beginning place of wisdom? Might it not be the ongoing dwelling place of wisdom? Might wisdom lead us eventually, humbly and faithfully away from fear.

"There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. The one who fears is not made perfect in love." (1 John 4:18)

This is not dogma. It is merely a thought that needs to be tested against the hearts and minds of other Spirit-Dwellings and against the rest of Scripture. The context of that 1 John passage seems to support it.

A Movement of Mercy

I took my youth group to the “Catholic Action Center” this past Sunday. This is a place of hope for the homeless in Lexington, KY that seeks to fill the gaps missed by other organizations.

Before they opened in 2000 they talked to homeless people at a town hall meeting and asked what they needed most and then tried to fill those needs. Besides things like food, shelter, and clothes, they needed a place to go to the bathroom, a place to clean up, and a place to hang out. Though they did those things, often they were subject to being arrested for loitering, public urination, etc. In addition, they needed a place to wash their clothes. After all, how could they put their best foot forward at interviews and things (both physically and in their own mindsets) if they were wearing dirty, nasty clothing? So this Center and some surrounding buildings attempt to meet those needs.

It proved to be a great experience. Some of us served food while others sorted clothes to be given out at “God’s Garments”. The center is based on the “Catholic Worker Movement” which started during the Great Depression in the 30s. It is not affiliated with Catholicism but with the universal understanding that all of God’s people should be cared for. I recommend finding a center in your area and getting involved, as it is all done by volunteer efforts.

Below is a brief history of the movement written by Jim Forest for The Encyclopedia of American Catholic History.

The Catholic Worker Movement By Jim Forest

The Catholic Worker movement was founded in 1933 during the Great Depression by Dorothy Day at the urging of Peter Maurin. It is best known for houses of hospitality located in run-down sections of many cities, though a number of Catholic Worker centers exist in rural areas. Food, clothing, shelter and welcome is extended by unpaid volunteers to those in need according to the ability of each household. In 1995 there were 134 Catholic Worker communities, all but three in the United States.

"Our rule is the works of mercy," said Dorothy Day. "It is the way of sacrifice, worship, a sense of reverence."

Beyond hospitality, Catholic Worker communities are known for activity in support of labor unions, human rights, cooperatives, and the development of a nonviolent culture. Those active in the Catholic Worker are often pacifists people seeking to live an unarmed, nonviolent life. During periods of military conscription, Catholic Workers have been conscientious objectors to military service. Many of those active in the Catholic Worker movement have been jailed for acts of protest against racism, unfair labor practices, social injustice and war.

With its stress on voluntary poverty, the Catholic Worker has much in common with the early Franciscans, while its accent on community, prayer and hospitality has Benedictine overtones.

"We try to shelter the homeless and give them clothes," Dorothy Day explained, "but there is strong faith at work. We pray. If an outsider who comes to visit us doesn't pay attention to our prayers and what that means, then he'll miss the whole point."

It is unlikely that any religious community was ever less structured than the Catholic Worker. Each community is autonomous. There is no board of directors, no sponsor, no system of governance, no endowment, no pay checks, no pension plans. Since Dorothy Day's death, there has been no central leader.

Friday, November 28, 2008

An Amazing Story on Mother Angelica

I find this story truly inspiring.

From "God’s Little Trojan Horse on Crutches": Raymond Arroyo on Mother Angelica. Arroyo is the author of Mother Angelica: The Remarkable Story of a Nun, Her Nerve, and a Network of Miracles by Raymond Arroyo.

In 1981 when nobody gave this woman a chance, the bishops’ conference had already announced their plans to start and launch a cable network the year after she launched hers. They had millions of dollars at their disposal, they had scads of consultants: they had the theology they believed the contemporary church ached for. And yet, here was this little nun in Birmingham, Alabama, with no broadcast experience, no letters following her name except for the religious order that she belonged to, and $200 in the bank and she kind of bumbles into television.

She’s faced with the quandary of having to buy a satellite dish, which costs about $1.5 million but she doesn’t have the money to do so. After conning a RCA vice president into sending the thing down to her, the satellite is delivered that day in ’81 and she has to present the deliveryman with $600,000 at the point of delivery or they can’t deliver the satellite.

She goes out to greet the delivery man, and she’s stalling–she’s taking the guy on a tour of the monastery, she’s handing out cookies, anything to keep him from asking for the money. Finally, he asks for the $600,000 and she says–"Let me go pray for a minute, I’ll be right back." She goes into the chapel and she kneels down and as spouses are wont to do, she kind of tried to make her spouse feel guilty. She says, "I thought you wanted this satellite Lord and I wheeled and dealed and I got it for you and now I’m having a little problem, we need this money or I’m going to have to turn your satellite away."

And she kind of waits for the money to fall from the ceiling and it doesn’t, so she decides to get up and turn the delivery truck away. And as she walks out, one of the sisters comes running out of the monastery and says, "Mother, there is a man on the phone and he’s very insistent, he needs to talk to you and he won’t get off the line." She said, "But, I got big business out here, Sister." She says, "I know, but he’s very insistent." So she says, "Oh, give me the phone." So she talks to this guy. It’s a businessman calling from his yacht in the Bahamas. He read one of her little spiritual books she had written, a little mini book, tracts on the spiritual life, years before. He’s calling because this book changed his life, helped him reconcile with his family and he’s calling to make a donation to her book ministry, a donation of $600,000. She says, "Can you send it right now?"

He wired the funds in. That was the down payment for the satellite that to this day continues to beam EWTN all over the country. I saw the transfer papers. I didn’t believe the story myself. I pulled the records and there it was. Pretty astounding stuff. Her story is replete with things like this.

Monday, November 24, 2008

The Great Ommission - Part 1

No product that is marketed today can turn you into Jesus. It is not the shoes that make someone like Christ. It isn’t what they drink. And it isn’t what they wear. It isn’t all the Jesus junk you can buy at stores. We often think that the very act of becoming a Christian makes us like Christ. To some extent this is true but not completely.

We throw around that title, “Christian” with some authority. But the word “Christian” is used only 3 times in the NT. Let me introduce you to another word. That word is “Disciple”. Disciple occurs 269 times in the NT and it isn’t just about the 12 we normally think of. The New Testament is a book about disciples, by disciples, for disciples. A disciple is someone who is devoted to becoming exactly like Jesus Christ. A disciple stands on a road with the fulfillment of the kingdom of God in sight, struggling down the path to make it there. Being a Christian is the end result of a lifetime of discipleship. Acts records that the first people to be called Christians were not new converts, but disciples. These were people who were devoted to growing in Christ. They were willing to give up their lifestyle for Christ. They were willing to give up their selfishness for Christ. They were willing to suffer persecution for Christ. They were willing to die for Christ. They were worthy to be called followers of Christ. They were worthy to be called Christians.

It isn’t easy to be a disciple of Christ. When Jesus was around, people would come up to him and tell him that they wanted to follow him. Basically, he told them to drop all their concerns, drop their ambitions, drop their comfort, and drop their enjoyable lifestyle and then follow him. The disciples knew what it meant to follow Christ – they would go with him, learn from Him, obey him, and imitate him. They knew what they would have to do and what it would cost them. They knew that being a disciple meant that they must lay their lives down, and take up a cross instead. That they would have to take up a lifestyle that would be tough, that would be costly, and that would be painful. Why did they bother? Why should we bother? Why even consider discipleship if it hurts so much? Won’t it ruin our life on this earth? Is it worth it?

Most of the time, we answer, “No, it is not worth it. It is not worth leaving the comfort of the life I am enjoying.” Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote a book called The Cost of Discipleship where he attacked easy Christianity and cheap grace. But I want to turn that around and attack the problem from the other end. What are the costs of nondiscipleship? What happens when we do not seek to be like Christ and settle for easy Christianity? What are those costs? There is a quote I have posted by my workspace as a constant reminder. It is by Dallas Willard. He says,
“Nondiscipleship costs abiding peace, a life penetrated by love, faith that sees everything in light of God’s overriding governance for good, hopefulness that stands firm in the most discouraging of circumstances, power to do what is right and withstand the forces of evil. In short, it costs exactly that abundance of life that Jesus said he came to bring (John 10:10).”

The amazing thing about these blessings of discipleship is that they are engrained in our very being. We cry out for these, yet we often fail to grasp them because we seek them from the world, from ourselves, and from other people. But their true fulfillment cannot be found there. They are found only when we become like Christ.

Friday, November 21, 2008

I Killed Osama Bin Laden

During World War II, the teachings of those who were nonviolent were misconstrued, as they are today, by war-supporting theologians like Reinhold Niebuhr. Niebuhr gave a "spiritual" backbone to the people who wanted spiritual justification to go to Europe and fight Hitler. This stance made him a popular prophet for the people and their leaders.

In the process, Niebuhr misunderstood nonviolent people as arguing "that nonresistance, or forgiveness, is a means of overcoming evil in an enemy." Nonviolent people are still stereotyped as believing we can win victory over the enemy if we just love. G.H.C. MacGregor answered that argument in a lengthy eight-page article in Fellowship, June 1941, Part 2. I would like to share just one small yet key excerpt: "The disciple's aim in nonresistance is not to overcome evil in another, but to discipline his own life and make it more worthy of the Kingdom." MacGregor's teaching is true in our time like it was true in the time of World War II. The people of God are supposed to live lives worthy of the Kingdom. Whether these lives transform those around us is not up to us. We are not the Holy Spirt; we are only followers of Jesus trying to live out faithfully his tough teachings.

We can have victory over the enemy if we love everyone, but I think the nonviolent individual and the war supporting individual are talking about two different enemies, one physical and one spiritual. To the radical follower, the teachings of Jesus on loving our enemies and turning the other cheek do not concern an earthly victory, although that can be the outcome. Earthly victories are not our focus when confronting evil; our focus is to be faithful to following Christ no matter what the situation or the cost involved.

Yesterday, I found an essay that was published in Fellowship, September, 1940. I imagined reworking it into an essay about killing Osama, hence the title of this post, but I just did not have the creative power. I will let it stand on its own. I pray that it will impact you the way it impacted me.

I Killed Adolf Hitler
A Confession
By J. Carson Pritchard, a minister from Rhode Island

I have made several attempts on the life of Adolf Hitler. I remember the times--most of them--and most of the places. Naturally Hitler denies that I have killed him or tried to kill him. Hitler denies my attempts in the very best possible way; by refusing to die. I remember the first attempt I made on his life. Hitler remembers that time well. We were both younger then. He was a corporal. The Central Powers were making their last great stand. I tried then to take the lives of all the Hitler family--father, mother, cousins, all. I tried to take the life of his leader, the Kaiser. Considering the thoroughness of my plans and attempts they should all have died. They didn't. The last time I made an attempt on his life was a few Sundays ago about 11:15 in the morning. Several Sunday school superintendents had tried earlier in the day but they were as unsuccessful as I. That is; we killed him, but he refused to die.

I murdered him in my heart. I presume that my prayers lacked point; they did not lack fervor. My prayers must have been of such small bore that they were ineffectual in murder. The power behind them probably wasn't strong enough for such long range work; had I been nearer with just the Channel between instead of the whole Atlantic ocean I might have been more successful. My prayers should have found their murderous way into his heart. As it is the murder remains in my heart just as a dud shell remains in the barrel of the gun. Sometimes the explodes in the barrel and kills the gunner. I tried murdering him in 1918. I failed then. I have failed again 22 years after. My prayers must be dud.

I'm not confessing murder because I haven't murdered him--yet. No one can find a single dead body. They have to find the body before they can try a man for murder. They couldn't even get me for attempted murder because they wouldn't find an instrument of violence in my hand. This prayer gun is so much like a pop gun. I would just be laughed out of court. Anyway, I'm a pacifist and besides that Hitler is still alive.

I don't murder people in cold blood. I don't seem to be able to murder them in the heat of spirit either. I had this murder in my heart in 1918. I couldn't get it out of the barrel then. I tried to aim that murder at the Germans then. Instead of getting it in their hearts it didn't even get in their hair.

I've even tried to learn German. I thought that our God, being an English speaking god, might not be well enough informed about the real needs of those fine German people who have been corrupted by their leader. I learned a few of the simpler words of German before I gave that up. Now that they have German gods over there I may be able to do them more damage. The Jews will keep Yahweh informed. The English will keep the Anglican god informed. Now if I can draft the German speaking God we may be able to hit them a crushing blow. We should be able to blockade their source of spiritual supply.

I had quite an argument with a man about all this. He is probably a German himself or else in their pay. He was condemning my prayerful warfare on three counts; (1) that I was supposed to be a neutral and should not engage in such attempts until I declared my prayful war, (2) that I was an avowed pacifist and this murderous hope was incompatible with my pacifism, (3) that Germany had a real score to settle with the British and since England made the rules years ago Germany was playing its own game by its own rules. This man is wrong as you can see. I excuse him on two counts; (1) he is not well informed and, (2) as I said he may be in the pay of Germany (in their Fifth Column, or is it Sixth?) or else he is a German.

He was a Lutheran and as he had a great regard for Holy Scripture too, I thought I would justify my prayful warfare by a quotation from Scripture which clears up this whole matter. So I referred him to Matthew 9:4 which says that I should do the works of my Father while it is yet day. Now anyone with the least imagination knows that a German victory would be equivalent to night. The sun would set on the British Empire and all that we hold of value. Too, we know that the will of God is in this case. I turned to that verse for him. I had made a slight error! That verse was John 9:4. Before I could make that little correction he had me read Matthew 9:4. It says, "Wherefore think ye evil in your heart"? I couldn't see any connection whatever between that and needing to get Hitler out of the way of peace. Our argument broke down then into one on Biblical criticism.

But right now, I've got to do something before this murder spreads further over my body. It's like a disease that runs its course and then settles in the extremities of the human body. It was in my heart. It spread to my mind. Now murder may be settling this very minute in my fingers. Then I might have to confess a moral suicide instead of this moral murder!

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Interview with N.T. Wright

Entertaining but also informative interview of N.T. Wright by Colbert about what "heaven" is going to be like based on Wright's new book Surprised by Hope. Some intriguing thoughts. Let me know what you think (probably having not read the book).

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Napoleon on Violence and Making an Empire that Lasts

Here is some wisdom from Napoleon:

The more I study the world, the more I am convinced of the inability of force to create anything durable. Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and I myself have founded empires; but upon what did those creations of our genius depend? They depended upon force. Jesus Christ founded his empire upon love and to this very day millions would die for him.

Reprinted in The Reporter, Vol.2, No. 16, February 15, 1944

Do You Hear What I Hear?


What are the sounds we associate with Christmas? The ringing of bells. "Ho ho ho". Carols. Children laughing. The crunch of freshly fallen snow. These are among the most pleasant sounds of the season.

The more jaded would suggest that ringing of the cash register is more descriptive of the season. Perhaps also would be the smashing of piggy banks, the scraping of the bottoms of out barrels, and spoiled toddlers crying for more.

But there is more. Can you hear it? The hushed whimper of a father in prison who will not be seeing his children this Christmas. The hunger pangs of the homeless. The clanking chains of the enslaved and oppressed. If you listen closely, you'll be reminded that it will be a blue Christmas for many hurting and lonely people in our neighborhood and around the world.

Don't stop. There is more to hear. Keep listening. Do you hear it? There among the moos and baas of the barnyard comes the cooing of a baby. A baby has born both a peasant and a king. Amongst the parties, the commercialism, and cries of the broken comes song sung by and army of angels.

"Glory to God in the highest,
and on earth peace to men on whom his favor rests."

God's favor has been given to us in the form a of baby. But not just in any baby, but in Jesus (the name means the LORD saves), Emmanuel (God is with us).

As followers of King Jesus, we believe that these were the best sounds of the season.

We also believe that Jesus is the answer to those other sounds as well. He is the answer to consumerism by infusing meaning deeper than a dollar. He teaches grace and goodness.

He is the answer to hurting and broken. The Prince of peace, the bringer of restoration.

Do your hear what I hear? It is the call of King Jesus. He calls us to join him. He invites us to a life with deep meaning. He requests we join him in bring peace, joy, and love to the world.

Monday, November 17, 2008

95 Theses Rap

I have been working feverishly on a paper, learning German, and add to that preaching at church on Sunday, so I don’t have an original post for today. However, I have a great video for all of you Church History nerds out there, brought to you by the good folks from Yale. They have spoofed Jay-Z’s “99 Problems” to convey one of the great events of the Reformation – Luther’s 95 Theses. You can check out the work on their website at http://www.95thesesrap.com/. Enjoy.

Friday, November 14, 2008

If You Voted Obama, You Better Do Penance or You Will Go To Hell

In a follow up to the church taking a stance against Obama post from my personal blog the the other day, here is the granddaddy of all prejudiced churches.

No communion for Obama supporters

It's down to one issue.

Voting for a pro-abortion politician when a plausible pro-life alternative exits constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil, and those Catholics who do so place themselves outside of the full communion of Christ's Church and under the judgment of divine law. Persons in this condition should not receive Holy Communion until and unless they are reconciled to God in the Sacrament of Penance, lest they eat and drink their own condemnation.


And here is another quote:

In fact, in this election, for the sake of argument, if the Republican candidate had been pro-abortion, and the Democratic candidate had been pro-life, everything that I wrote would have been exactly the same.

The Great Spiritual Questions

I find myself being more theological than faithful at times. I am ready to join in on a discussion on whether God knows the future, is the King James Version a better translation, why did God create a system of substitutionary atonement, or any other such grand theological conversation. But in the end, they all seem to be distractions to what really matters.

"Do not be afraid of what you are about to suffer. I tell you, the devil will put some of you in prison to test you, and you will suffer persecution for ten days. Be faithful, even to the point of death, and I will give you the crown of life" (Revelation 2:10).

None of the answers to the "great" theological questions really change whether I am faithful or not. They do not influence whether I give up Christ for a drunken orgy, my own personal financial gain, or a night of television. I can argue, and even have the right answers, but it really does not matter in the grand spiritual panorama.

Maybe those sort of discussions have some sort of role, but they should never move into the realm of spirituality. They are purely matters of trivia and debate. What really matters is whether I love my neighbor, am I faithfully living out what I know I need to live out, and am I helping shine the light of God. Great theological consistency is never a substitute for faithful living.

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Radical Homosexual Activist Group Interrupts Worship Service

I was sent this article. It read more like a fear-and-anger-filled rant to me, so I sought out Lansing State Journal's account.

I live by this credo: Do not fear(Luke 12:4-7). What happens when a community of faith operates in fear? It fails to continue to be a community of faith, that's what. You cannot both trust God and fear the things of this world. Fear God, and no one else.

So, I rebuke the sort of fear-mongering I see in the Wold Net Daily's article, which seems to subtly promote physical retaliation to non-violent (though offensive) protests.

I call for us to set our hearts and minds on things above where Christ is seated. Now is the time for us to put to death every reaction which is born from our earthly nature; the anger, rage, malice, slander and filthy language which do nothing to heal. It is essential that we become completely clothed in compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness and patience. We must model the same persistent forgiveness that the Lord has for us. Bottom line: we must love, love and love. Nothing else is acceptable for a people called to reflect who Jesus is, and what He is like.

Just because an enemy tries to incite a riot does not mean that we oblige. That's not the Way of Jesus. He says to love our enemies and pray for those who persecute us that we may be sons of our Father in heaven. We do not bash back. We love back.

Monday, November 10, 2008

Modern Theologians

I studied Erasmus in class last week. He was known especially for his Latin translation of the Bible in 1516, the first new Latin version of the bible since the Vulgate (produced by Jerome in the fourth century CE). Erasmus’s Paraclesis, the preface to his edition, calls for the translation of the Bible into all vernacular languages so that humble plowmen, farmers, weavers, and “even the lowliest women” could read or recite the Bible in their native dialect.

Erasmus lived during the Reformation and one issue of the time was that of various clerical abuses in the Church. Thus his call to make the scriptures available and accessible to the unlearned was a call to dispense with the control that the clergy had over the laypeople.

The following excerpt from his Paraclesis represents a wonderful ideal of all of God’s people reading, interpreting, and living out the tenants of the Bible. It also serves as a warning and reminder to me, as one seeking to become a “professional theologian” not to take myself too seriously. More than that, Erasmus implores us to pursue God, not just information about God.

“For I fear that one may find among the theologians men who are far removed from the title they bear, that is, men who discuss earthly matters, not divine, and that among the monks who profess the poverty of Christ and the contempt of the world you may find something more than worldliness. To me he is truly a theologian who teaches not by skill with intricate syllogisms but by a disposition of mind, by the very expression and the eyes, by his very life that riches should be disdained, that the Christian should not put his trust in the supports of this world but must rely entirely on heaven, that a wrong should not be avenged, that a good should be wished for those wishing ill, that we should deserve well of those deserving ill, that all good men should be loved and cherished equally as members of the same body...And if anyone under the inspiration of the spirit of Christ preaches this kind of doctrine, inculcates it, exhorts, incites, and encourages men to it, he indeed is truly a theologian, even if he should be a common laborer or weaver. And if anyone exemplifies this doctrine in his life itself, he is in fact a great doctor. Another, perhaps, even a non-Christian, may discuss more subtly how the angels understand, but to persuade us to lead here an angelic life, free from every stain, this indeed is the duty of the Christian theologian.”

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Jesus For President

Shane Claiborne spoke at chapel at Asbury Theological Seminary Tuesday, Election Day, and had some great things to say. They have to change the mics early on, making some of the audio rough to start with, but they get it ironed out about 5 minutes in. The sermon is about 30 minutes long, but well worth the listen/watch. Enjoy.

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

A Prayer for President-elect Barack Obama

First of all, I praise the God of mercy and healing for working so powerfully in the lives of people in this country that they could look beyond the color of a man's skin, and an odd-sounding name to elect Barack Obama. It is a miraculous transformation of hearts that would never have happened without God's Holy Spirit working through his church.

I also breathe an 'Amen' in recognition that Jesus is as much on his thrown today as he was eight years ago, and sixteen years ago. His term will never expire, and no power is beyond his reach.

King Jesus, may your hand be on our next President. Keep him safe from all who would do him harm, especially for those would seek to harm him physically.

I pray that you surround him with loyal and trustworthy allies. Fill his cabinet with wisdom and integrity.

I ask that you would bring healing to this country through him. Press upon his heart the needs of a country beyond the desires of his party. Through your Spirit, clothe him with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, patience, and love.

Bring to ruin all plans to churn up hatred and fear for political ends. Let the liars and biggots and fear-mongers be forever silenced.

Help all of those who have put their hope in any politician see the error of their ways and return to you, the Forever King. Amen

Monday, November 3, 2008

Communion Meditation


Around the time we celebrate Easter, the Jewish people celebrate Passover – a festival commemorating God’s saving act in freeing the Israelites from slavery in Egypt. This feast is a serious time, but there is also an element of celebration as they look forward to God continuing to act on their behalf.

For the Jewish people, a proper celebration of the Passover would take place in Jerusalem – surrounded by fellow believers and in the glorious temple dedicated to God. Unfortunately a “proper” celebration of the Passover has not taken place for almost 2000 years, since the destruction of the temple in 70 AD. With no temple in Jerusalem there is no place for the sacrifices to occur. In addition, with the cost and difficulty of returning to their homeland, most Jews celebrate the Passover in their homes, with their families. And as the feast comes to a close, they raise their glasses and say simply, “Next year in Jerusalem.” With these simple worlds they express a hope that next year, things will be different. That perhaps God and history will move in a direction that favors a full celebration of one of their most significant and cherished holidays.

And as we gather around the communion table we are in a similar position. This thing we call the “Lord’s Supper,” is not really a supper is it? A small piece of bread and a sip of juice would not be much of a Thanksgiving dinner would it? No, it is not a great feast like we normally think of around holidays. Though a wonderful experience, it pales in comparison to the great banquet God has prepared for us. As Paul says in 1 Corinthians 13:12, now we see a poor reflection but one day we will see the full extent of God’s love face to face. What we do around this table is meaningful, but only because it points to a fuller, more realized feast that we will celebrate with the risen Savior in the presence of God.

So as we partake of this simple meal, may we do so with hope and expectation. Jesus has instituted this meager meal not as our last supper, but to tide us over until we celebrate the great banquet in heaven. This meal reminds us that we have placed our hope in the one who has overcome sin and death in our place. Bound up in this meal are all of our expectations of greater things to come. So as we partake, may we, with all the hope we can muster, say together, “Next time, in the New Jerusalem.” (Rev. 21:2)

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Reasons Not to Vote

I stumbled across the following essasy that encourages Christians not to vote. I don't agree with some of the presentation, but was interested to hear what you have to say about it. I apologize for the length, but I didn't write it.

A Non-Voting Manifesto?
By Tripp York, Visiting Prof. of Religious Studies, Elon University, NC

There are few things imagined in this life more dutiful than the so called ‘responsibility’ of every American to vote. Despite the fact that many decide, for whatever reasons, not to vote, the very idea that voting is an indispensable requirement on each individual goes without question.
Let me state at the very beginning that any qualms I may have with voting stem from neither apathy nor indifference. It simply makes little sense to me, given that we are as Aristotle claimed, “political animals,” that anyone would or should be indifferent to voting. Christians (whom I am addressing) should be concerned with the goods that constitute the temporal cities of this time between times, and voting is but one means of attempting to seek those goods. Nevertheless, I often wonder if what has been passed down to us as an unquestioned duty is the only way, or even the best way, to be political? To be even more specific, is it possible that some form of conscientious objection to voting could be understood as an act of politics that is concerned with the good of the polis? Could it function as a witness to a different order, one not predicated on the enforcement of legislation, laws, and the lording of power over one another? If so, what would be the rationale for such an objection, or at least a hesitation, to the act of voting? What sort witness would this attempt to make? In order to answer these questions I have jotted down eight possible reasons why voting could be problematic for Christians. If nothing else, at least dealing with these possible objections should make us more conscientious voters, if we decide Christian civic responsibility entails voting.

I. Romans 13 demands subordination to the government.
Which government? All governments. Paul (while sitting in jail) demanded that Christians are to be submissive to all powers that be because, despite how fallen they are, they, nevertheless, are ordained by God. Rebellion against such powers is understood as rebellion against God and is, thus, not permitted. It makes little sense, therefore, to perpetuate any order that was founded on explicit disobedience to God. The United States of America only comes into being inasmuch as it rebelled against the God-ordained powers of the English monarchy (the irony of this is rich as the most patriotic of souls love to use this text to demand obedience to every whim of their beloved nation-state without recognizing the hypocrisy that made it possible for it to come into being in the first place). To vote for the maintenance of such an order seems to approve of this act of disobedience against God, or at least renders Paul’s command nonsensical as it can be disobeyed if enough time has elapsed from the inception of the said rebellion/revolution.

II. Jesus requires that his disciples not be like those Gentiles who lord their power over others, even it is for some sort of ‘good’ (Mt 20:25).
Christians are, as Jesus says in Matthew 20:26, not to be power-hungry. Rather they are to be as slaves to one another. Perhaps it would be one thing if the elected officials of this nation were forced to take office; instead these are all individuals who desperately want to be in power and all of whom beg and plead with the common folk for their votes, all to the tune, at least in regards to the last election, of more than $1 billion—$1 billion spent to convince us that we should exalt those who would be like those Gentiles who lord their power over others. If we are forbidden to be like them, why would it be permissible to place them in the kind of posture that Jesus decries?

III. Capitalism, the socio-economic order that underwrites this culture, is predicated on the seven deadly sins.
Without just one of these sins, it would fold and collapse on itself. For instance, if there was no greed this economy would be destroyed. We are taught to never be satisfied, to never have our fill, to never be satiated, to remain in a perpetual state of want, all in the name of the common good. How is this even remotely akin to the kind of desires that should be produced by ecclesial formation? Goods are only good if they are shared goods, at least according to scripture and early Christian history. Sharing goods in this culture would be a sin. An aside: Let it not be lost on us that immediately after September 11, 2001, the President of the U.S. demanded that the people of this commonwealth respond by neither prayer nor patience—rather he told the people that they should respond by . . . shopping! The saddest thing about this ‘command’ is that this was actually a morally legitimate response by the President (as it would have been for any president for that matter). Had people ceased spending money, the economy would have collapsed. Therefore, in such a culture one responds to terrorism via trips to the mall as well as supplying a lot of missiles and the youth of the country. This is our way of life? This is what Christians are willing to both die and kill for? How can we vote for any potential Caesar under this sort of politic?

IV. While we are on the subject of the seven deadly sins, let’s look at pride.
Outside of the word ‘freedom’—which is by far the most seductive god competing for our allegiance—there simply is no greater form of idolatry than the worship of, freedom. Pride is a term that is uttered again and again by this country’s leaders. For some reason I am reminded by both scripture and tradition that pride is purely representative of the fall of humanity. There is really nothing to be proud about, except as one can boast with St. Paul, our hope in Jesus. Pride has become the very means that Christians have co-opted to this culture, for it is because of pride that we seem to lack the ability or desire to practice repentance, confession, humility and servanthood—all of which are at the heart of Christian discipleship. Voting is, de facto, an exercise in pride. Especially if you find yourself on the winning side.

V. The kingdoms of this world seem to be ruled by Satan.
Once Satan took Jesus to the mountain-top and offered worldly power: “The devil led him up to a high place and showed him in an instant all the kingdoms of the world. And he said to him, ‘I will give you all their authority and splendor, for it has been given to me, and I can give it to anyone I want to. So if you worship me, it will all be yours.’ Jesus answered, ‘It is written: Worship the Lord your God and serve him only’” (Lk 4:5-8). Though the powers may be ordained by God, they are, nevertheless (as with all of creation), in rebellion against God. According to this passage it is Satan leading this rebellion. Satan offers the kingdoms to Jesus because they belong to Satan. He gives them, or at least offers them, to whom Satan pleases. All Jesus had to do in order to rule the world the way most of us imagine it is to be ruled, was to worship Satan. Thus it would appear that all of the kingdoms of the world, though rightly ordained for the maintenance of social harmony, are currently under satanic influence. One way to lead them is to worship Beelzebub, hence, my reluctance to vote for this sort of ruler.

VI. Regardless of which leader wins, that ruler will expect my allegiance.
That is, of course, a problem in and of itself, as Christians are called to serve only one Master. One way this affects Christians is that leaders of empires simply cannot enact the radical kind of peace Christians are to offer their enemies. Rulers, history has shown, must take up arms against their enemies. They must engage in warring, or at least threats of warring, in order to secure certain goods. This is a far cry from the peacemaking and non-violence which Jesus calls from his disciples. Jesus demands that those who would follow him must turn the other cheek, pray for those who persecute us (ever heard a president pray for an enemy—except that they be destroyed?), and refuse to exercise vengeance, which belongs only to God.
Yet any nation-state, not just this one but all of them, demands the exact opposite. The literal imitation of Jesus in non-violence must be rejected in order to exist and survive in the world. I would argue that any order that demands that a Christian not imitate Jesus is a demonic one indeed, a stumbling block for Christ-like discipleship.

VII: The United States may (not) be the greatest Babylon on the planet, but she is still a Babylon.
As William Stringfellow astutely pointed out, if we are to read all nations biblically then we must recognize that they are all Babylons. No nation or culture is the Heavenly Jerusalem or the City of God. They are, therefore, parasitic on the good that is the heavenly city, and the church, as the image of this city on earth, is called to show the state that it is not the heavenly city. This is her task. It is not to buttress the powers that be, but to show them, through her witness that whatever the powers that be are, they are not the church. One way to resist being co-opted by the powers of this world, I imagine, might be to neither vote nor take office.

VIII: Voting is an attempt to elect someone who will enact, legislate and enforce your political values upon others.
That is the point of voting—to elect someone who will legislate and enforce your convictions. If a candidate promises this, you will support her or him. That is, you expect your candidate to do what you want them to do for the betterment of how you envision the world and how you secure the peace of the city.
This process, in a sense, alleviates the burden of Christians to be the church because now Christians can ask the state require of others our Christian convictions. The church does not need to create an alternative community, does not need to be prophetic, does not need radical discipleship, because Christians now have become the very powers and principalities that Paul claims Jesus has defeated.
By the simple refusal to vote perhaps we can at least see how we have all become seduced by such a power in such a way that we can see how our faith has been compromised and domesticated in the name of something other than the Triune God.
These simple musings are but a few reasons why I am currently hesitant to cast my vote for yet another Caesar.