You have probably received one. The email rumor attacks on Barak Obama are everywhere.
“He is a smoker.”
“He is secretly a radical Muslim with ties to terrorism.”
“He hates America and refuses to salute the flag.”
When someone first approached me with these rumors, I asked why Hillary Clinton was not hammering him on these things. She would easily win, and she was really struggling at the time.
To others, I have referred them to snopes.com and have urged them not to be used as a conduit in schemes to perpetuate falsehood. I told them, “There may be many reasons not to vote for Obama, but most of this stuff is just false.”
Most of these accusations are easily disproved with video of him leading the Senate in the pledge of allegiance or what have you.
One that is a bit trickier is the accusation that Obama belongs to a racist church. His church is the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago. On their website, the church is described as “unashamedly black and unapologetically Christian.” Two of their ten vision points express a commitment to Africa and to the education of “African people in diaspora”.
Is this racism? If Hillary Clinton belonged to a church that was unashamedly white and committed to the education of white people, we would certainly say it is racist. So, yes, I suppose it is racist in that it holds race is a primary qualifier for whom they seek to serve.
The next question would be; is it wrong? We have all been taught that racism is wrong. So much so, that it may be hard to examine the question further. So, please allow me to rephrase the question. Is it loving?
Unlike other forms of racism which are used to keep a particular race down, this form is used to pick a particular race up.
In this case, being for one group does not equate to being against others. From all reports of people who have had actual contact with the church, they do not treat people of other races poorly. They embrace everybody.
So, though it is technically racist, I do not think it is entirely wrong.
But one more point: I think it has some terrible (though unintended) consequences. Far too many people will see those values as exclusionary. Far too few will be able to navigate the subtle differences in the forms of racism.
If TUCC is committed to reconciliation, as their website reports, they should consider the feelings of white people. Few will want to reconcile with them if they feel they are being discriminated against because of the color of their skin.
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I read an article on this very topic on World Net Daily the other day. I'm sure the article had some degree of slant, but none-the-less it does appear that whites could very well feel excluded. Another interesting fact was a quote from Obama who said that there were a lot of things that he did NOT agree with his pastor on. One thing in particular is that Obama considers himself more of a Universalist.
Is there really any work of reconciliation among churches happening? I have not heard of two churches joining together in a long time. We just accept one another spiritually while we still remain divided physically. When the physical does not line up with the spiritual, I would propose that the spiritual is not happening.
As for Obama,
Hilary's church came out against her last week. The week before that she was claiming the Methodist teachings were the guiding source of her life. Then she came out in favor of gambling. Methodists are about as anti-gambling as any group of Christians can be. The Methodists pointed this out.
As for Obama's church. If they really are Africans in diaspora, why do they not just go home. I am sure they can. People would probably help raise money to help end the "unwanted exile" that is part of the diaspora. Overall, we are a loving people and I believe we would right the mistake our civilization made and send them back to Africa if they wanted.
Do not take that as me saying blacks should be shipped back to Africa. I like friends no matter what race they are, and blacks are welcomed to stay here. I just think the diaspora line of thought is a little ridiculous when you could go back. If Obama started talking about a black diaspora, then I would definitely not vote for him.
As for people and their churches, I do not know a single person who believes everything their church teaches. That is one of the reasons I appreciate the church of Christ/Christian churches. I do not have to adhere a set of written rules. I just have to believe the Bible is the primary authority and be baptized. That's about it. So I will not hold one's church against or for them.
Post a Comment