Why “membership” has lost its meaning
Randy likes to compare this system with the Jewish system. Here most people are "born" into the church; the choice is made for them. Confirmation is when they say "yes" to that choice. It is difficult for some to make the decision to get out of the church, because of family, job or political pressure.
The reason most people are still members is tradition. If you are a member you can have your baby christened and this is usually a big family affair. If you ask the young people that age why they are going to confirmation, most would say because of the money. They usually get several thousand dollars in gift money from grandparents, godparents and other relatives. If you were confirmed and stay in the church, then you can have a church wedding. And of course the circle closes with a religious funeral. In some places the local cemetery is owned by the church and if you aren't a member, you must be buried elsewhere. Some people see their church membership as a kind of insurance: "If there really is a God, then I'll be covered."
We might look at that and say, “How silly. Membership in a church has lost its meaning. They are no more members of a church than the building is the church.” And such a statement would be true. But as I look around, is membership in our churches much different? Not really. Many Christians are “born into it.” Many want to be married in a church despite having little to no affiliation with that church. Many may attend on Sunday to put their time in but are not truly invested in the church. And of course there is the fire insurance aspect of saying “I belong to the church, therefore I won’t go to hell.”
As shallow as those reasons are, I sort of expect them from worldly people. And yet, church people also focus on membership. It seems, especially in the
What will follow in my next post in a week will be a way of approaching membership that reminds us all of what it is truly about, and perhaps return that sense of belonging that has been lost.
3 comments:
Right on. The only part I might take issue with is "especially in the Church of Christ". I don't know that we are any worse.
You may be right, but i guess in my experience, the CoC seems to have more focus on membership. For example, he need to send letters of member transference to churches when they leave, etc.
Perhaps my interaction with other denominations and how they handle things is too limited.
I had to official walk forward and pronounce my membership (although I have never became a member anywhere else in all of my days) before the church made me a deacon.
Membership at the denominational church I attended before that was not pushed. However, that might be changing.
I think the line might not be denominational but recently planted churches versus established churches.
Post a Comment